Steinberg Ryan L, Brooks Nathan A, Thomas Lewis J, Mott Sarah L, O'Donnell Michael A
Department of Urology, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, 3231 RCP, Iowa City, IA 52242-1089.
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Urol Oncol. 2017 May;35(5):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Adjuvant intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) remains the standard-of-care for high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Conflicting reports exist regarding disparate outcomes among BCG strains. We sought to determine whether a difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) existed between TICE BCG and Connaught BCG strains used with interferon (IFN) for the treatment of NMBIC.
A post hoc analysis of the phase 2 BCG/IFN study, conducted from May 1999 to February 2001. A total of 901 patients had sufficient records for analysis. Enrollment criteria were liberal and included primary and recurrent NMIBC, patients with and without carcinoma in situ, and patients with prior BCG failure. At the beginning, 3 to 8 weeks after transurethral resection or biopsy, patients received induction with 6 weekly intravesical treatments of BCG (TICE or Connaught) with 50 million units of IFN. Surveillance for recurrence began 4 to 6 weeks after induction and quarterly thereafter for 2 years. If no recurrence was identified, patients received maintenance therapy. Separate models were created for BCG naïve and failure patients. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Overall, 609 patients received TICE BCG and 292 received Connaught BCG with similar baseline characteristics. BCG strain was not associated with worse RFS in both the multivariable BCG naïve model (P = 0.28) and BCG failure model (P = 0.53). Duration of disease, tumor focality, tumor size, and BCG failure interval (in the BCG failure model) were associated with worse RFS.
No significant difference in RFS was observed among patients treated with TICE BCG or Connaught BCG in combination with IFN.
辅助性膀胱内灌注卡介苗(BCG)仍然是高级别非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准治疗方法。关于不同BCG菌株的不同结果存在相互矛盾的报道。我们试图确定用于治疗NMBIC的TICE BCG和Connaught BCG菌株在无复发生存期(RFS)方面是否存在差异,并联合使用干扰素(IFN)。
对1999年5月至2001年2月进行的2期BCG/IFN研究进行事后分析。共有901例患者有足够的记录进行分析。纳入标准较为宽松,包括原发性和复发性NMIBC、有或无原位癌的患者以及先前BCG治疗失败的患者。开始时,经尿道切除或活检后3至8周,患者接受6次每周一次的膀胱内BCG(TICE或Connaught)诱导治疗,并联合5000万单位的IFN。诱导治疗后4至6周开始复发监测,此后每季度监测2年。如果未发现复发,患者接受维持治疗。为初治BCG患者和治疗失败患者分别建立模型。使用Cox比例风险回归进行多变量分析。
总体而言,609例患者接受了TICE BCG治疗,292例患者接受了Connaught BCG治疗,两者基线特征相似。在多变量初治BCG模型(P = 0.28)和BCG治疗失败模型(P = 0.53)中,BCG菌株与较差的RFS均无关联。疾病持续时间、肿瘤局灶性、肿瘤大小和BCG治疗失败间隔时间(在BCG治疗失败模型中)与较差的RFS相关。
在联合使用IFN的情况下,接受TICE BCG或Connaught BCG治疗的患者在RFS方面未观察到显著差异。