• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用汇总数据的蒙特卡洛决策曲线分析。

Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data.

作者信息

Hozo Iztok, Tsalatsanis Athanasios, Djulbegovic Benjamin

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Gary, IN, USA.

USF Health Program for Comparative Effectiveness Research, Division for Evidence-based Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Feb;47(2):176-183. doi: 10.1111/eci.12723.

DOI:10.1111/eci.12723
PMID:28042671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decision curve analysis (DCA) is an increasingly used method for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models, but its application requires individual patient data. The Monte Carlo (MC) method can be used to simulate probabilities and outcomes of individual patients and offers an attractive option for application of DCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We constructed a MC decision model to simulate individual probabilities of outcomes of interest. These probabilities were contrasted against the threshold probability at which a decision-maker is indifferent between key management strategies: treat all, treat none or use predictive model to guide treatment. We compared the results of DCA with MC simulated data against the results of DCA based on actual individual patient data for three decision models published in the literature: (i) statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, (ii) hospice referral for terminally ill patients and (iii) prostate cancer surgery.

RESULTS

The results of MC DCA and patient data DCA were identical. To the extent that patient data DCA were used to inform decisions about statin use, referral to hospice or prostate surgery, the results indicate that MC DCA could have also been used. As long as the aggregate parameters on distribution of the probability of outcomes and treatment effects are accurately described in the published reports, the MC DCA will generate indistinguishable results from individual patient data DCA.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a simple, easy-to-use model, which can facilitate wider use of DCA and better evaluation of diagnostic tests and predictive models that rely only on aggregate data reported in the literature.

摘要

背景

决策曲线分析(DCA)是一种越来越多地用于评估诊断试验和预测模型的方法,但其应用需要个体患者数据。蒙特卡罗(MC)方法可用于模拟个体患者的概率和结果,并为DCA的应用提供了一个有吸引力的选择。

材料与方法

我们构建了一个MC决策模型来模拟感兴趣结果的个体概率。将这些概率与决策者在关键管理策略(即全部治疗、不治疗或使用预测模型指导治疗)之间无差异的阈值概率进行对比。我们将基于MC模拟数据的DCA结果与基于文献中发表的三个决策模型的实际个体患者数据的DCA结果进行了比较:(i)他汀类药物用于心血管疾病的一级预防,(ii)为晚期患者转诊至临终关怀机构,以及(iii)前列腺癌手术。

结果

MC DCA和患者数据DCA的结果相同。就使用患者数据DCA为他汀类药物使用、转诊至临终关怀机构或前列腺手术的决策提供信息而言,结果表明也可以使用MC DCA。只要已发表报告中准确描述了结果概率和治疗效果分布的总体参数,MC DCA将产生与个体患者数据DCA无法区分的结果。

结论

我们提供了一个简单、易于使用的模型,它可以促进DCA的更广泛应用,并更好地评估仅依赖文献中报告的总体数据的诊断试验和预测模型。

相似文献

1
Monte Carlo decision curve analysis using aggregate data.使用汇总数据的蒙特卡洛决策曲线分析。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Feb;47(2):176-183. doi: 10.1111/eci.12723.
2
Extensions to regret-based decision curve analysis: an application to hospice referral for terminal patients.基于遗憾的决策曲线分析的扩展:在终末期患者临终关怀转诊中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Dec 23;11:77. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-77.
3
Decision curve analysis based on summary data.基于汇总数据的决策曲线分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):281-289. doi: 10.1111/jep.13945. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
4
A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: a novel method for eliciting decision makers' preferences and decision-making.后悔理论在决策曲线分析中的应用:一种用于获取决策者偏好和决策的新方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Sep 16;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-51.
5
Expected utility versus expected regret theory versions of decision curve analysis do generate different results when treatment effects are taken into account.当考虑治疗效果时,决策曲线分析的预期效用与预期遗憾理论版本确实会产生不同的结果。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/jep.12676. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
6
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.决策曲线分析:一种评估预测模型的新方法。
Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.
7
Effect of the statin choice encounter decision aid in Spanish patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial.他汀类药物选择决策辅助工具对西班牙2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Clinical management and burden of prostate cancer: a Markov Monte Carlo model.前列腺癌的临床管理与负担:马尔可夫蒙特卡罗模型
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113432. eCollection 2014.
9
[Statins in primary prevention: how to share the decision?].[他汀类药物用于一级预防:如何共同做出决策?]
Rev Med Suisse. 2015 Nov 25;11(496):2222-6.
10
The combined analysis of uncertainty and patient heterogeneity in medical decision models.医学决策模型中不确定性和患者异质性的综合分析。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):650-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10381282. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The combined use of serum Raman spectroscopy and D dimer testing for the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.血清拉曼光谱与D-二聚体检测联合用于急性主动脉夹层的早期诊断
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 5;10(12):e32474. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32474. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Development and validation of a leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor-1 prognostic signature for lower-grade gliomas.白细胞相关免疫球蛋白样受体-1 预后标志物在低级别胶质瘤中的开发和验证。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):712-732. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4945. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Proprioceptive Focal Stimulation (Equistasi®) May Improve the Quality of Gait in Middle-Moderate Parkinson's Disease Patients. Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Crossover, Italian Multicentric Study.
本体感觉聚焦刺激(Equistasi®)可能改善中度帕金森病患者的步态质量。双盲、双模拟、随机、交叉、意大利多中心研究。
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 18;10:998. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00998. eCollection 2019.