Tang Hao, Chen Hong, Yang Dejin, Jiang Yi, Zhang Chunyu, Zhou Yixin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Institute of Microelectronics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Feb;42:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
Although both the posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty have been proven to effectively relieve pain and restore basic functions, the joint gap width during flexion was reported to be different due to the presence or absence of posterior cruciate ligament, which may lead to different intra-articular force distribution. In this study, we investigated the distinctions in intra-articular force distribution between the two types of TKA designs in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis.
Forty five patients (50 knees) with varus knee osteoarthritis were prospectively included, with each 25 knees receiving cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty, respectively. With an intra-articular force measurement system, the intra-articular force distribution with knee flexion at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, and 120° were recorded in all patients.
The total force was similar for posterior stabilized and cruciate retaining knees at all flexion degrees. However, force in the medial compartment accounted for 59.8%-84.0% of total force in posterior stabilized knees, while 27.4%-65.7% in cruciate retaining knees. In cruciate retaining knees, no significant difference was found between forces in the two compartments at 30° flexion (P=0.444), but force was significantly concentrated in the lateral side during 45°-120° flexion (P=0.000-0.028).
Although the entire intra-articular forces were similar between CR and PS knees at different flexion angles, medial part had higher force than lateral part when PS knee was used. The posterior cruciate ligament do a role in soft balance, and make the force more evenly distributed.
尽管后稳定型和保留交叉韧带型全膝关节置换术均已被证明能有效缓解疼痛并恢复基本功能,但据报道,由于后交叉韧带的存在与否,屈膝时的关节间隙宽度有所不同,这可能导致不同的关节内力分布。在本研究中,我们调查了内翻膝骨关节炎患者中两种类型全膝关节置换术设计在关节内力分布上的差异。
前瞻性纳入45例(50膝)内翻膝骨关节炎患者,其中25膝分别接受保留交叉韧带型和后稳定型全膝关节置换术。使用关节内力测量系统,记录所有患者在膝关节屈曲0°、30°、45°、60°、90°和120°时的关节内力分布。
后稳定型和保留交叉韧带型膝关节在所有屈曲角度下的总力相似。然而,后稳定型膝关节内侧间室的力占总力的59.8%-84.0%,而保留交叉韧带型膝关节为27.4%-65.7%。在保留交叉韧带型膝关节中,屈膝30°时两间室的力无显著差异(P=0.444),但在屈膝45°-120°时力显著集中在外侧(P=0.000-0.028)。
尽管在不同屈曲角度下,保留交叉韧带型和后稳定型膝关节的整个关节内力相似,但使用后稳定型膝关节时内侧部分的力高于外侧部分。后交叉韧带起到软组织平衡作用,使力分布更均匀。