Freytag Antje, Biermann Janine, Ochs Andreas, Lux Gerald, Lehmann Thomas, Ziegler Jana, Schulz Sven, Wensing Michel, Wasem Jürgen, Gensichen Jochen
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Germany; Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital of LMU Munich; Institute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen, Germany; Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena University Hospital, Germany; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Nov 25;113(47):791-798. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0791.
In Germany, enhanced primary care ('GP-centered health care') is being promoted in order to strengthen the role of GPs and improve the quality of primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a GPcentered healthcare program, established in 2011 in the German federal state of Thuringia, on healthcare costs, care coordination, and pharmacotherapy.
We conducted a retrospective case-control study based on insurance claims data. Participants were followed from 18 months before the start of the program to 18 months after its introduction. The intervention and control groups were matched via propensity scores.
40 298 participants enrolled in the program for a minimum of 18 months (between July 2011 and December 2012) were included in the intervention arm of the study. The mean age was 64.8 years. There was no significant difference in total direct costs (primary outcome) between cases and controls. Turning to secondary outcomes, the number of GP consultations rose sharply (+47%; p<0.001), there were less patients who consulted more than one GP (-41.4%; p<0.001), and less specialist consultations without referral (-5.8%; p<0.001) among patients in the intervention group. The number of patients who participated in Disease Management Programs (DMPs) increased (+17.7%; p<0.001), as did the number of GP home visits (+5.0%; p<0.001), specialist consultations (+4.1%; p<0.01), and the number of hospitalizations (+4.3%; p=0.006). The costs for pharmaceuticals were lowered by 3.9% (p<0.001).
The study indicates that the GP-centered healthcare program does not lead to lower direct health care costs. However, it may lead to more intense and better coordinated healthcare in older, chronically ill patients with multiple conditions. Further studies are needed on long-term effects and clinical endpoints.
在德国,为了强化全科医生的作用并提高初级医疗服务质量,正在推行强化初级医疗服务(“以全科医生为中心的医疗保健”)。本研究的目的是评估2011年在德国图林根州设立的以全科医生为中心的医疗保健项目对医疗成本、护理协调和药物治疗的影响。
我们基于保险理赔数据进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。参与者从项目开始前18个月至引入项目后18个月进行跟踪。干预组和对照组通过倾向得分进行匹配。
40298名至少参加该项目18个月(2011年7月至2012年12月)的参与者被纳入研究的干预组。平均年龄为64.8岁。病例组和对照组之间的总直接成本(主要结果)没有显著差异。转向次要结果,干预组患者的全科医生诊疗次数大幅增加(+47%;p<0.001),咨询不止一位全科医生的患者减少(-41.4%;p<0.001),未经转诊的专科诊疗减少(-5.8%;p<0.001)。参加疾病管理项目(DMPs)的患者数量增加(+17.7%;p<0.001),全科医生家访次数增加(+5.0%;p<0.001),专科诊疗次数增加(+4.1%;p<0.01),住院次数增加(+4.3%;p=0.006)。药品成本降低了3.9%(p<0.001)。
该研究表明,以全科医生为中心的医疗保健项目不会降低直接医疗成本。然而,它可能会为患有多种疾病的老年慢性病患者带来更密集、协调更好的医疗服务。需要对长期影响和临床终点进行进一步研究。