Tomlinson Martin, Jennings Amy, Macrae Alastair, Truyers Isabelle
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Theriogenology. 2017 Feb;89:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Bull breeding soundness evaluation (BBSE) is commonly undertaken to identify bulls that are potentially unfit for use as breeding sires. Various studies worldwide have found that approximately 20% of the bulls fail their routine prebreeding BBSE and are therefore considered subfertile. Multiple articles describe the use of testicular ultrasound as a noninvasive aid in the identification of specific testicular and epididymal lesions. Two previous studies have hypothesized a correlation between ultrasonographic testicular parenchymal pixel intensity (PI) and semen quality; however to date, no published studies have specifically examined this link. The aim of this study, therefore, was to assess the relationship between testicular parenchymal PI (measured using trans-scrotal ultrasonography) and semen quality (measured at BBSE), and the usefulness of testicular ultrasonography as an aid in predicting future fertility in bulls, in particular those that are deemed subfertile at the first examination. A total of 162 bulls from 35 farms in the South East of Scotland were submitted to routine BBSE and testicular ultrasonography between March and May 2014, and March and May 2015. Thirty-three animals failed their initial examination (BBSE1) due to poor semen quality, and were re-examined (BBSE2) 6 to 8 weeks later. Computer-aided image analysis and gross visual lesion scoring were performed on all ultrasonograms, and results were compared to semen quality at BBSE1 and BBSE2. The PI measurements were practical and repeatable in a field setting, and although the results of this study did not highlight any biological correlation between semen quality at BBSE1 or BBSE2 and testicular PI, it did identify that gross visual lesion scoring of testicular images is comparable to computer analysis of PI (P < 0.001) in identifying animals suffering from gross testicular fibrosis.
公牛繁殖健全性评估(BBSE)通常用于识别可能不适宜用作种公牛的公牛。全球多项研究发现,约20%的公牛在常规配种前BBSE中不合格,因此被认为生育能力低下。多篇文章描述了使用睾丸超声作为一种非侵入性辅助手段来识别特定的睾丸和附睾病变。此前有两项研究推测超声检查的睾丸实质像素强度(PI)与精液质量之间存在相关性;然而,迄今为止,尚无已发表的研究专门探讨这一联系。因此,本研究的目的是评估睾丸实质PI(使用经阴囊超声测量)与精液质量(在BBSE时测量)之间的关系,以及睾丸超声在预测公牛未来生育能力方面的作用,特别是对于那些在首次检查时被认为生育能力低下的公牛。2014年3月至5月以及2015年3月至5月期间,来自苏格兰东南部35个农场的162头公牛接受了常规BBSE和睾丸超声检查。33头动物因精液质量差在初次检查(BBSE1)时不合格,并在6至8周后重新接受检查(BBSE2)。对所有超声图像进行了计算机辅助图像分析和大体视觉病变评分,并将结果与BBSE1和BBSE2时的精液质量进行比较。PI测量在现场环境中切实可行且可重复,尽管本研究结果未突出显示BBSE1或BBSE2时的精液质量与睾丸PI之间存在任何生物学相关性,但确实发现睾丸图像的大体视觉病变评分在识别患有严重睾丸纤维化的动物方面与PI的计算机分析相当(P < 0.001)。