Beuscher Vanessa D, Kuramatsu Joji B, Gerner Stefan T, Köhn Julia, Lücking Hannes, Kloska Stephan P, Huttner Hagen B
Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(3-4):117-123. doi: 10.1159/000454775. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Hemispheric location might influence outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). INTERACT suggested higher short-term mortality in right hemispheric ICH, yet statistical imbalances were not addressed. This study aimed at determining the differences in long-term functional outcome in patients with right- vs. left-sided ICH with a priori-defined sub-analysis of lobar vs. deep bleedings.
Data from a prospective hospital registry were analyzed including patients with ICH admitted between January 2006 and August 2014. Data were retrieved from institutional databases. Outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Outcome measures (long-term mortality and functional outcome at 12 months) were correlated with ICH location and hemisphere, and the imbalances of baseline characteristics were addressed by propensity score matching.
A total of 831 patients with supratentorial ICH (429 left and 402 right) were analyzed. Regarding clinical baseline characteristics in the unadjusted overall cohort, there were differences in disfavor of right-sided ICH (antiplatelets: 25.2% in left ICH vs. 34.3% in right ICH; p < 0.01; previous ischemic stroke: 14.7% in left ICH vs. 19.7% in right ICH; p = 0.057; and presence/extent of intraventricular hemorrhage: 45.0% in left ICH vs. 53.0% in right ICH; p = 0.021; Graeb-score: 0 [0-4] in left ICH vs. 1 [0-5] in right ICH; p = 0.017). While there were no differences in mortality and in the proportion of patients with favorable vs. unfavorable outcome (mRS 0-3: 142/375 [37.9%] in left ICH vs. 117/362 [32.3%] in right ICH; p = 0.115), patients with left-sided ICH showed excellent outcome more frequently (mRS 0-1: 64/375 [17.1%] in left ICH vs. 43/362 [11.9%] in right ICH; p = 0.046) in the unadjusted analysis. After adjusting for confounding variables, a well-balanced group of patients (n = 360/hemisphere) was compared showing no differences in long-term functional outcome (mRS 0-3: 36.4% in left ICH vs. 33.9% in right ICH; p = 0.51). Sub-analyses of patients with deep vs. lobar ICH revealed also no differences in outcome measures (mRS 0-3: 53/151 [35.1%] in left deep ICH vs. 53/165 [32.1%] in right deep ICH; p = 0.58).
Previously described differences in clinical end points among patients with left- vs. right-hemispheric ICH may be driven by different baseline characteristics rather than by functional deficits emerging from different hemispheric functions affected. After statistical corrections for confounding variables, there was no impact of hemispheric location on functional outcome after ICH.
脑出血(ICH)后的半球位置可能会影响预后。INTERACT研究提示右侧半球脑出血的短期死亡率较高,但未解决统计失衡问题。本研究旨在通过对叶出血和深部出血进行预先定义的亚组分析,确定右侧与左侧脑出血患者长期功能预后的差异。
分析来自前瞻性医院登记处的数据,纳入2006年1月至2014年8月期间收治的脑出血患者。数据从机构数据库中检索。使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分评估预后。将预后指标(12个月时的长期死亡率和功能预后)与脑出血位置和半球相关联,并通过倾向评分匹配解决基线特征的失衡问题。
共分析了831例幕上脑出血患者(429例左侧,402例右侧)。在未调整的总体队列中,就临床基线特征而言,右侧脑出血存在不利差异(抗血小板药物使用:左侧脑出血为25.2%,右侧脑出血为34.3%;p<0.01;既往缺血性卒中:左侧脑出血为14.7%,右侧脑出血为19.7%;p=0.057;以及脑室内出血的存在/范围:左侧脑出血为45.0%,右侧脑出血为53.0%;p=0.021;Graeb评分:左侧脑出血为0[0-4],右侧脑出血为1[0-5];p=0.017)。虽然在死亡率以及预后良好与不良患者的比例方面没有差异(mRS 0-3:左侧脑出血为142/375[37.9%],右侧脑出血为117/362[32.3%];p=0.115),但在未调整分析中,左侧脑出血患者更常出现良好预后(mRS 0-1:左侧脑出血为64/375[17.1%],右侧脑出血为43/362[11.9%];p=0.046)。在对混杂变量进行调整后,比较了一组均衡的患者(每组n=360),结果显示长期功能预后无差异(mRS 0-3:左侧脑出血为36.4%,右侧脑出血为33.9%;p=0.51)。对深部与叶脑出血患者的亚组分析也显示预后指标无差异(mRS 0-3:左侧深部脑出血为53/151[35.1%],右侧深部脑出血为53/165[32.1%];p=0.58)。
先前描述的左侧与右侧半球脑出血患者临床终点的差异可能是由不同的基线特征驱动的,而非受不同半球功能影响所产生的功能缺陷所致。在对混杂变量进行统计校正后,半球位置对脑出血后的功能预后没有影响。