Lee Jae-Hong, Kweon Helen Hye-In, Choi Seong-Ho, Kim Young-Taek
Department of Periodontology, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Dentistry, Daejeon, Korea .
Department of Periodontology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea .
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016 Dec;46(6):396-404. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.6.396. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars, using data collected during from 2002 to 2015.
Traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was assessed by examining clinical parameters (bleeding on probing, probing pocket depth, fremitus, and tooth mobility) and radiographic parameters (loss of supporting bone and widening of the periodontal ligament space) over a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clinical factors (gender, age, implant type, maxillary or mandibular position, opposing teeth, and duration of functional loading) were evaluated statistically in order to characterize the relationship between implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars.
The study inclusion criteria were met by 283 patients, who had received 347 implants in the posterior region. The incidence of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars was significantly higher for splinted implants (=0.004), implants in the maxillary region (<0.001), and when implants were present in the opposing teeth (<0.001). The other clinical factors of gender, age, and duration of functional loading were not significantly associated with traumatic occlusion.
This study found that the risk of traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars increased when splinted implants were placed in the maxillary molar region and when the teeth opposing an implant also contained implants.
本回顾性研究旨在利用2002年至2015年期间收集的数据,确定后牙区牙种植体与相邻前磨牙创伤性咬合之间的关联。
通过检查临床参数(探诊出血、探诊袋深度、牙合震颤和牙齿松动度)和影像学参数(支持骨丧失和牙周膜间隙增宽),在平均5年的随访期间评估相邻前磨牙的创伤性咬合。对临床因素(性别、年龄、种植体类型、上颌或下颌位置、对颌牙和功能负荷持续时间)进行统计学评估,以描述后牙区种植体与相邻前磨牙创伤性咬合之间的关系。
283例患者符合研究纳入标准,这些患者在后牙区接受了347颗种植体。夹板式种植体(=0.004)、上颌区种植体(<0.001)以及对颌牙存在种植体时(<0.001),相邻前磨牙创伤性咬合的发生率显著更高。性别、年龄和功能负荷持续时间等其他临床因素与创伤性咬合无显著关联。
本研究发现,当在上颌磨牙区植入夹板式种植体以及种植体的对颌牙也有种植体时,相邻前磨牙发生创伤性咬合的风险增加。