Singh Gurinder, Verma Sanjeev, Singh Devinder Preet, Yadav Sumit Kumar, Yadav Achla Bharti
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Genesis Institute of Research and Dental Science , Ferozepur, Punjab, India .
Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dr. Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences , Panjab University, Chandigarh, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):ZC75-ZC78. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23553.8912. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
Beta angle utilizes three skeletal landmarks - point A, point B, and point C (the apparent axis of the condyle). It is formed between A-B line and point A perpendicular to C-B line. Further this angle indicates the severity and the type of skeletal dysplasia in the sagittal dimension and it changes with the growth pattern of the patient. Hence, it is important to study the dependence of beta angle on the growth pattern.
The present study was designed to evaluate the correlation of Beta angle with point A-Nasion-point B (ANB) angle, points A and B to palatal plane (App-Bpp), Wit's appraisal and Maxillary-Mandibular plane angle Bisector (MMB) and Frankfort-Mandibular plane Angle (FMA) in Skeletal Class I, Class II and Class III malocclusion groups.
Pre-treatment lateral head cephalo-grams of 120 subjects in age group of 15-25 years were obtained. Three skeletal Class I, Class II and Class III malocclusion groups (40 each) were assorted on the basis of ANB, MMB, App-Bpp, Wit's appraisal and FMA. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mean differences were calculated to compare the study groups. Bivariate correlations among different parameters of these groups were obtained.
Normal values of beta angle in skeletal Class I group, skeletal Class II group and skeletal Class III group was 31.33±3.25, 25.28±4.28 and 40.93±4.55 respectively. Overall beta angle showed a strong correlation with all parameters of anterio-posterior dysplasia indicators except FMA.
Beta angle shows weak correlation with FMA and is not affected by growth pattern/jaw rotation. The normal values are in same range irrespective of the differences in craniofacial morphology.
β角利用三个骨骼标志点——A点、B点和C点(髁突的视轴)。它是由A - B线与垂直于C - B线的A点所形成的。此外,这个角度在矢状面维度上指示骨骼发育异常的严重程度和类型,并且会随着患者的生长模式而变化。因此,研究β角与生长模式的相关性很重要。
本研究旨在评估骨骼I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形组中β角与A点 - 鼻根点 - B点(ANB)角、A点和B点到腭平面(App - Bpp)、Wit值评估、上颌 - 下颌平面角平分线(MMB)以及法兰克福 - 下颌平面角(FMA)之间的相关性。
获取了120名年龄在15 - 25岁之间受试者的治疗前头颅侧位X线片。根据ANB、MMB、App - Bpp、Wit值评估和FMA将三个骨骼I类、II类和III类错牙合畸形组(每组40例)进行分类。计算方差分析(ANOVA)和均值差异以比较研究组。获得这些组不同参数之间的双变量相关性。
骨骼I类组、骨骼II类组和骨骼III类组中β角的正常值分别为31.33±3.25、25.28±4.28和40.93±4.55。总体而言,β角与除FMA外的所有前后发育异常指标参数均显示出强相关性。
β角与FMA显示出弱相关性,且不受生长模式/颌骨旋转的影响。无论颅面形态存在差异,正常值都在相同范围内。