• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lay Attitudes Toward Trust, Uncertainty, and the Return of Pediatric Research Results in Biobanking.公众对生物样本库中儿科研究结果的信任、不确定性及反馈的态度。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(3):160-166. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1053008. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
2
The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.向参与者反馈研究结果:癌症患儿青少年及家长的试点调查问卷
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Apr;48(4):441-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20766.
3
Parents as the start of the solution: a social marketing approach to understanding triggers and barriers to entering a childhood weight management service.父母是解决问题的起点:一种通过社会营销方法来理解进入儿童体重管理服务的触发因素和障碍。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Jan;28 Suppl 1:83-92. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12237. Epub 2014 May 28.
4
A qualitative approach to community and provider needs assessment in a telehealth project.远程医疗项目中社区与服务提供者需求评估的定性方法
Telemed J. 1998 Fall;4(3):225-35. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225.
5
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
6
What Potential Donors in Research Biobanking Want to Know: A Large Population Study of the Italian Twin Registry.生物样本库研究中潜在捐赠者想了解的内容:对意大利双胞胎登记处的大规模人群研究
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Dec;14(6):456-463. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0012. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.生物样本库中的隐私与互惠关系:德国与英国策略之比较
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):272-84. doi: 10.1159/000336671. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study.审视公众拒绝同意 DNA 生物库:一项基于瑞典人群的实证研究数据。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032367.
9
'Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes.“没有什么是真正安全的”:一项关于为研究目的匿名和共享健康数据的过程的焦点小组研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01488.x. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations.关于向三个种族和少数民族群体的家庭披露基因研究结果的观点。
J Community Genet. 2020 Oct;11(4):433-443. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00472-6. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care.临床中实施基因组学的机遇、资源和技术。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):511-520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31140-7. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Factors influencing parental trust in medical researchers for child and adolescent patients' clinical trial participation.影响患儿及青少年患者临床试验参与中父母对医学研究人员信任的因素。
Psychol Health Med. 2019 Jul;24(6):691-702. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1566623. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.父母对健康儿童接受基因组检测结果的态度和期望。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):44-53. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx044.

本文引用的文献

1
Do participants in genome sequencing studies of psychiatric disorders wish to be informed of their results? A survey study.精神疾病基因组测序研究的参与者希望被告知他们的结果吗?一项调查研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101111. eCollection 2014.
2
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.研究参与者的基因组结果返还:底线、上限和中间选择。
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8.
3
Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children.探讨儿童基因检测和测序中的伦理挑战。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(3):3-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.879945.
4
Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.父母对儿童靶向和偶然基因组研究结果反馈的态度。
Genet Med. 2014 Aug;16(8):633-40. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.201. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Whole-exome/genome sequencing and genomics.全外显子组/基因组测序和基因组学。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(Suppl 3):S211-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1032E.
6
Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.儿科研究中全基因组测序结果的反馈:P3G国际儿科平台声明
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;22(1):3-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.176. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.ACMG 临床外显子组和基因组测序中偶然发现报告的推荐标准。
Genet Med. 2013 Jul;15(7):565-74. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
8
Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.儿童基因检测和筛查的伦理和政策问题。
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):620-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3680. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research.重新审视关于基因研究中偶然发现的伦理辩论。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):44-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.757972.
10
The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results.涅槃谬误与结果的回归
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):43-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.755826.

公众对生物样本库中儿科研究结果的信任、不确定性及反馈的态度。

Lay Attitudes Toward Trust, Uncertainty, and the Return of Pediatric Research Results in Biobanking.

作者信息

Lynch John, Hines Janelle, Theodore Sarah, Mitchell Monica

机构信息

University of Cincinnati.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(3):160-166. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1053008. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1080/23294515.2015.1053008
PMID:28050575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5201190/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trust plays a role in participants' reactions to clinical residual biobanks. The purpose of this study is to assess whether trust in medical researchers and negative reactions of uncertainty influences the attitudes of parents of pediatric research participants toward the return of genomic research results from biobanking.

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted in collaboration with two community-based organizations. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and the trust in research and intolerance of uncertainty scales. The focus groups were then conducted according to a thematic focus group guide; discussions were transcribed and analyzed by two trained coders.

RESULTS

Emerging themes included the importance of returning research results to both children and parents, sharing results with few limitations based on a child's age, and the desire for results even when researchers had concerns about analytic validity. Negative reactions to uncertainty appear to have influenced only one theme: the paradoxical claim by participants with stronger reactions to uncertainty that they had a "right to information."

CONCLUSION

Participants prefer to receive most or all of the results produced by genomic research, and they want their children, within variable age restrictions, to have access to that information as well.

摘要

背景

信任在参与者对临床剩余生物样本库的反应中起作用。本研究的目的是评估对医学研究人员的信任以及不确定性的负面反应是否会影响儿科研究参与者的父母对生物样本库基因组研究结果反馈的态度。

方法

与两个社区组织合作开展焦点小组讨论。参与者完成一份人口统计学调查问卷以及对研究的信任和不确定性不耐受量表。然后根据主题焦点小组指南进行焦点小组讨论;讨论内容由两名经过培训的编码员转录并分析。

结果

新出现的主题包括向儿童和父母反馈研究结果的重要性、基于儿童年龄在有限制的情况下分享结果,以及即使研究人员对分析有效性存在担忧,参与者仍希望获得结果。对不确定性的负面反应似乎仅影响了一个主题:对不确定性反应较强的参与者矛盾地声称他们“有权获得信息”。

结论

参与者倾向于接收基因组研究产生的大部分或所有结果,并且他们希望自己的孩子在不同年龄限制下也能获取这些信息。