Zoghbi Yasmina, Gerth David J, Tashiro Jun, Golpanian Samuel, Thaller Seth R
From the Division of Plastic, Aesthetic, & Reconstructive Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 May;78(5):516-520. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000936.
Abdominal based breast reconstruction exists in a continuum from pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap to deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap. DIEP flap has the advantage of complete rectus abdominis sparing during harvest, thus decreasing donor site morbidity. Aim of this study is to determine whether the surgical advantages of the DIEP flap impact postoperative outcomes versus the free TRAM flap (fTRAM).
We reviewed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2010-2011) for all cases of DIEP and fTRAM breast reconstruction. Inclusion criteria were: female sex and patients undergoing DIEP or fTRAM total breast reconstruction. Male sex was excluded from the analysis. We examined demographic characteristics, hospital setting, insurance information, patient income, comorbidities, postoperative complications (including reoperation, hemorrhage, hematoma, seroma, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, wound infection, and flap loss), length of stay, and total charges (TCs). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of increased length of stay and TCs.
Fifteen thousand eight hundred thirty-six cases were identified. Seventy percent were white, 97% were insured, and 83% of patients were treated in an academic teaching hospital setting. No mortalities were recorded. The DIEP cohort was more likely to be obese (P = 0.001). Free TRAM cohort was more likely to suffer pneumonia (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 3.7), wound infection (P = 0.001; OR, 1.7), and wound dehiscence (P < 0.001; OR, 4.3). Type of reconstruction did not appear to affect risk of revision, hemorrhage, hematoma, seroma, or flap loss. Total charges were higher in the DIEP group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fTRAM was an independent risk factor for increased length of stay (P < 0.001; OR, 1.6), and DIEP was an independent risk factor for increased TCs (P < 0.01; OR, 1.5). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications.
The fTRAM cohort was more likely to develop surgical site complications and have an increased length of stay, but TCs were higher for the DIEP group.
基于腹部的乳房重建涵盖了从带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)到腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)游离皮瓣的连续过程。DIEP皮瓣的优势在于切取时能完全保留腹直肌,从而降低供区并发症的发生率。本研究的目的是确定DIEP皮瓣的手术优势是否会对术后结果产生影响,与游离TRAM皮瓣(fTRAM)相比。
我们回顾了全国住院患者样本数据库(2010 - 2011年)中所有DIEP和fTRAM乳房重建病例。纳入标准为:女性以及接受DIEP或fTRAM全乳重建的患者。男性被排除在分析之外。我们检查了人口统计学特征、医院环境、保险信息、患者收入、合并症、术后并发症(包括再次手术、出血、血肿、血清肿、心肌梗死、肺栓塞、伤口感染和皮瓣坏死)、住院时间和总费用(TCs)。进行双变量和多变量分析以确定住院时间延长和TCs增加的独立危险因素。
共识别出15836例病例。70%为白人,97%有保险,83%的患者在学术教学医院接受治疗。未记录到死亡病例。DIEP组患者更可能肥胖(P = 0.001)。游离TRAM组更易发生肺炎(P < 0.001;比值比[OR],3.7)、伤口感染(P = 0.001;OR,1.7)和伤口裂开(P < 0.001;OR,4.3)。重建类型似乎不影响翻修、出血、血肿、血清肿或皮瓣坏死的风险。DIEP组的总费用更高(P < 0.001)。多变量分析表明,fTRAM是住院时间延长的独立危险因素(P < 0.001;OR,1.6),而DIEP是TCs增加的独立危险因素(P < 0.01;OR,1.5)。术后并发症方面无显著差异。
fTRAM组更易发生手术部位并发症且住院时间延长,但DIEP组的TCs更高。