• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用缝线纽扣装置进行下胫腓联合固定后的深部感染

Deep Infections After Syndesmotic Fixation With a Suture Button Device.

作者信息

Fantry Amanda J, O'Donnell Seth W, Born Chris T, Hayda Roman A

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2017 May 1;40(3):e541-e545. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161229-02. Epub 2017 Jan 6.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20161229-02
PMID:28056156
Abstract

Suture button devices such as the TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, Florida) have been increasingly used for syndesmotic fixation of ankle fractures. Despite proposed advantages, prior studies have shown equivalent outcomes, with a theoretical decreased need for removal of hardware. Complications of suture button fixation of syndesmotic instability may be underreported and include lateral suture knot inflammation with or without granuloma formation, infection, aseptic osteolysis with widening of the tibial drill tunnels, heterotopic ossification, and osteomyelitis. In this case series, the authors review the current literature and describe 3 patients with TightRope fixation for syndesmotic instability who developed deep infection. The authors believe that braided suture within suture button devices may provide an environment conducive to the propagation of infection across the syndesmotic fixation tract. Evidence of suture button migration or osteolysis of the TightRope tract should prompt an infectious workup and removal of hardware. If there is concern for infection associated with the TightRope, the authors recommend removing both metallic buttons and the entirety of the suture to prevent harboring a nidus for further infection. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e541-e545.].

摘要

诸如TightRope(美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯市的Arthrex公司生产)之类的缝线纽扣装置已越来越多地用于踝关节骨折的下胫腓联合固定。尽管有其宣称的优势,但先前的研究表明其疗效相当,理论上减少了取出内固定装置的需求。下胫腓联合不稳定的缝线纽扣固定的并发症可能未得到充分报道,包括外侧缝线结炎症伴或不伴肉芽肿形成、感染、无菌性骨溶解伴胫骨钻孔隧道增宽、异位骨化和骨髓炎。在本病例系列中,作者回顾了当前文献,并描述了3例因下胫腓联合不稳定采用TightRope固定而发生深部感染的患者。作者认为,缝线纽扣装置内的编织缝线可能提供了一个有利于感染沿下胫腓联合固定通道扩散的环境。缝线纽扣移位或TightRope通道骨溶解的证据应促使进行感染方面的检查并取出内固定装置。如果担心与TightRope相关的感染,作者建议移除金属纽扣和整个缝线,以防止形成进一步感染的病灶。[《骨科》杂志。2017年;40(3):e541 - e545。]

相似文献

1
Deep Infections After Syndesmotic Fixation With a Suture Button Device.使用缝线纽扣装置进行下胫腓联合固定后的深部感染
Orthopedics. 2017 May 1;40(3):e541-e545. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161229-02. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
2
Osteomyelitis after TightRope(®) fixation of the ankle syndesmosis: a case report and review of the literature.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):130-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
3
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
4
Suture Button Fixation Versus Syndesmotic Screws in Supination-External Rotation Type 4 Injuries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.旋后-外旋IV型损伤中缝线纽扣固定与下胫腓螺钉固定的成本效益分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):210-217. doi: 10.1177/0363546516664713. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
5
An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.下胫腓联合损伤的评估与治疗进展
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):601-14. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0466-8. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
6
Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.Weber C型踝关节骨折下胫腓联合损伤的钛缆固定:一项多中心病例系列研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 May;27(4):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1882-8. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.关于伴有下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折治疗的系统评价与Meta分析:缝线纽扣固定与皮质骨螺钉固定的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):946-953. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.006.
8
Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.采用新型无结缝线纽扣装置治疗急性下胫腓联合韧带断裂患者的并发症发生率更低,更快恢复运动。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
9
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct.使用螺钉或缝线纽扣结构固定下胫腓联合损伤后腓骨运动的三维分析
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Dec;37(12):1350-1356. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666865. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
All-suture fixation of syndesmotic injuries: a case series.全缝线固定踝关节联合损伤:病例系列。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03797-3. Epub 2023 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of elastic versus rigid fixation in the treatment of acute tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.弹性与刚性固定治疗急性胫腓联合损伤的荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 2;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02448-2.
2
Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screws.按需去除下胫腓联合螺钉的成本效益。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):921-928. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02158-9. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
A Novel Adjustable EndoButton Fixation Assisted by 3D Printing Technology for Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Biomechanical Study.
一种新型3D打印技术辅助的可调节内纽扣固定治疗胫腓下联合损伤的生物力学研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 10;10:793866. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.793866. eCollection 2022.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.踝关节联合损伤伴骨间膜损伤的诊断与治疗:现状综述
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2539-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04396-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.