Jiang Xiaqing, Lin Ge, Islam K M Monirul
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, 984395 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4395, USA; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, 984395 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4395, USA.
Department of Health Services Research and Administration, 984395 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4395, USA; Joint Public Health Data Center, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (NDHHS), 301 Centennial Mall South, Lincoln, NE 68509, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;175:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.042. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Various socioeconomic factors were reported to be associated with receiving surgical treatment in localized, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in previous studies. We wanted to assess the impact of residential poverty on receiving surgical treatment in a state-wide population of localized NSCLC, adjusting for demographic, clinical, residence and tumor factors. Data on 970 patients with primary localized NSCLC were collected from the Nebraska Cancer Registry (NCR), and linked with the Nebraska Hospital Discharge Data (NHDD) between 2005 and 2009, as well as the 2010 Census data. Characteristics of patients with and without surgery were compared using Chi-square tests. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of receiving surgery for low versus high poverty were generated based on the series of logistic regression models controlling for demographics, comorbidity, residence and tumor histology. Patients who were 65 year old or younger, without comorbidities, single or married, and with adenocarcinoma histologic type were more likely to receive surgery. Without adjustment, poverty was negatively associated with receiving surgery. Patients who resided in low poverty neighborhoods (less than 5% of the households under poverty line) were twice more likely to receive surgery than those who lived in high poverty neighborhoods (more than 15% of the households under poverty line) (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.33-3.40). After adjustment, poverty was independently and negatively associated with receiving surgery treatment. Residents in low poverty neighborhoods were still about twice more likely to receive surgery than those in high poverty neighborhoods when the other demographic, urban/rural residency and clinical factors were adjusted (ORs 2.01-2.18, all p < 0.05). The mechanism of how living in poverty interacts with other factors and its impact on patient's choice and their chance of getting surgical treatment invites future studies.
以往研究报道,多种社会经济因素与局部非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受手术治疗有关。我们希望评估居住贫困对全州局部NSCLC患者接受手术治疗的影响,并对人口统计学、临床、居住和肿瘤因素进行调整。从内布拉斯加州癌症登记处(NCR)收集了970例原发性局部NSCLC患者的数据,并将其与2005年至2009年的内布拉斯加州医院出院数据(NHDD)以及2010年人口普查数据相链接。采用卡方检验比较接受手术和未接受手术患者的特征。基于一系列控制人口统计学、合并症、居住和肿瘤组织学的逻辑回归模型,得出贫困程度低与高的患者接受手术的未调整和调整后的比值比(OR)。65岁及以下、无合并症、单身或已婚且组织学类型为腺癌的患者更有可能接受手术。未经调整时,贫困与接受手术呈负相关。居住在低贫困社区(贫困线以下家庭不到5%)的患者接受手术的可能性是居住在高贫困社区(贫困线以下家庭超过15%)患者的两倍(OR 2.13,95%CI 1.33 - 3.40)。调整后,贫困与接受手术治疗独立且呈负相关。在调整了其他人口统计学、城乡居住和临床因素后,低贫困社区的居民接受手术的可能性仍比高贫困社区的居民高出约两倍(OR为2.01 - 2.