• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄儿童和成人的间隙检测:中心频率和斜坡持续时间

Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

作者信息

Buss Emily, Porter Heather L, Hall Joseph W, Grose John H

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

Hearing and Speech Department, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):172-181. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0010.

DOI:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0010
PMID:28056469
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5533555/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The age at which gap detection becomes adultlike differs, depending on the stimulus characteristics. The present study evaluated whether the developmental trajectory differs as a function of stimulus frequency region or duration of the onset and offset ramps bounding the gap.

METHOD

Thresholds were obtained for wideband noise (500-4500 Hz) with 4- or 40-ms raised-cosine ramps and for a 25-Hz-wide low-fluctuation narrowband noise centered on either 500 or 5000 Hz with 40-ms ramps. Stimuli were played continuously at 70 dB SPL, and the task was to indicate which of 3 intervals contained a gap. Listeners were 5.2- to 15.1-year-old children (n = 40) and adults (n = 10) with normal hearing.

RESULTS

Regardless of listener age, gap detection thresholds for the wideband noise tended to be lower when gaps were shaped using 4-ms rather than 40-ms ramps. Thresholds also tended to be lower for the low-fluctuation narrowband noise centered on 5000 Hz than 500 Hz. Performance reached adult levels after 11 years of age for all 4 stimuli. Maturation was not uniform across individuals, however; a subset of young children performed like adults, including some 5-year-olds.

CONCLUSION

For these stimuli, the developmental trajectory was similar regardless of narrowband noise center frequency or wideband noise onset and offset ramp duration.

摘要

目的

根据刺激特性的不同,间隙检测达到成人水平的年龄也有所不同。本研究评估了发育轨迹是否会因刺激频率区域或界定间隙的起始和结束斜坡的持续时间而有所不同。

方法

分别获取了具有4毫秒或40毫秒升余弦斜坡的宽带噪声(500 - 4500赫兹)以及以500赫兹或5000赫兹为中心、具有40毫秒斜坡的25赫兹宽的低波动窄带噪声的阈值。刺激以70分贝声压级持续播放,任务是指出三个间隔中的哪一个包含间隙。受试者为5.2至15.1岁的儿童(n = 40)和听力正常的成年人(n = 10)。

结果

无论受试者年龄如何,当使用4毫秒而非40毫秒的斜坡来塑造间隙时,宽带噪声的间隙检测阈值往往更低。以5000赫兹为中心的低波动窄带噪声的阈值也往往低于以500赫兹为中心的窄带噪声。对于所有四种刺激,11岁后性能达到成人水平。然而,个体间的成熟情况并不一致;一小部分幼儿的表现与成年人相似,包括一些5岁的儿童。

结论

对于这些刺激,无论窄带噪声中心频率或宽带噪声起始和结束斜坡持续时间如何,发育轨迹都是相似的。

相似文献

1
Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.学龄儿童和成人的间隙检测:中心频率和斜坡持续时间
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):172-181. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0010.
2
Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.自发噪声对学龄儿童和成人安静环境下检测阈值估计的影响。
Ear Hear. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):650-659. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000337.
3
Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.学龄儿童和成年人的间隙检测:固有包络调制和频率内线索可用性的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1098-107. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0132.
4
The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.噪声波动和频谱带宽对间隙检测的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1601. doi: 10.1121/1.4945095.
5
Noise increment detection in children 1 to 3 years of age.1至3岁儿童的噪音增量检测
Percept Psychophys. 2000 May;62(4):868-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03206928.
6
The effect of temporal placement on gap detectability.时间位置对间隙可检测性的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):3571-7. doi: 10.1121/1.428210.
7
Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.听觉神经病患儿的随机间隙检测试验和随机间隙检测试验-扩展结果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov;73(11):1558-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
8
Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.正常听力的婴儿和成人骨导听觉稳态反应的有效掩蔽水平。
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):257-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67f6.
9
Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation gaps and implications for binaural integration time.对耳间相关性间隙敏感度的电生理和心理物理不对称性及其对双耳整合时间的影响。
Hear Res. 2016 Feb;332:170-187. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Infant auditory temporal acuity: gap detection.婴儿听觉时间分辨力:间隙检测
Child Dev. 1992 Apr;63(2):260-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing and early life adversity: effects of developmental stress on sensory processing.听力与早期生活逆境:发育应激对感觉加工的影响
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02203-2.
2
Assessment of Central Auditory Processing in Children Using a Novel Tablet-Based Platform: Application for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.使用新型基于平板电脑的平台评估儿童的中枢听觉处理:在中低收入国家的应用。
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):176-183. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004085.
3
Binaural Frequency Modulation Detection in School-Age Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Effects of Interaural Modulator Phase.学龄儿童、青年人和老年人的双耳频率调制检测:两耳调制器相位的影响。
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):691-699. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000975.
4
Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.感知间隙检测在整个儿童晚期和青少年时期的差距位置效应。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2020 Jun;21(3):243-258. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00756-1. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Effects of Low Frequency Residual Hearing on Music Perception and Psychoacoustic Abilities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.低频残余听力对小儿人工耳蜗植入受者音乐感知和心理声学能力的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 3;13:924. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00924. eCollection 2019.
6
Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.降低模拟声道交互揭示正常听力儿童与成人在音位识别方面的差异。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):295-311. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000615.
7
The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.助听增益对听力损失儿童和成人的察觉阈的影响。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):969-979. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000558.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.噪声波动和频谱带宽对间隙检测的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Apr;139(4):1601. doi: 10.1121/1.4945095.
2
Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.学龄儿童和成年人的间隙检测:固有包络调制和频率内线索可用性的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1098-107. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0132.
3
Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.影响学龄儿童强度加工的因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):71-80. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0008). Epub 2012 Aug 15.
4
Monaural temporal integration and temporally selective listening in children and adults.儿童和成人的单耳时间整合与时间选择性听力
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jun;127(6):3643-53. doi: 10.1121/1.3397464.
5
Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.间隙检测中的自然边界与塞音的范畴知觉有关。
Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):761-74. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318185ddd2.
6
Frequency discrimination learning in children.儿童的频率辨别学习
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4393-402. doi: 10.1121/1.2890749.
7
Gap detection in modulated noise: across-frequency facilitation and interference.调制噪声中的间隙检测:跨频率促进与干扰。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):998-1007. doi: 10.1121/1.2828058.
8
Frequency discrimination in children: perception, learning and attention.儿童的频率辨别:感知、学习与注意力
Hear Res. 2008 Apr;238(1-2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.013. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
9
Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.声学和电听觉中的响度适应
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Mar;7(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0023-6. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
10
A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.一种基于样本辨别的内部噪声度量方法。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2147-57. doi: 10.1121/1.1610456.