• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

毒理学临床病理学中不良事件评估原则

Principles for Assessing Adversity in Toxicologic Clinical Pathology.

作者信息

Ramaiah Lila, Tomlinson Lindsay, Tripathi Niraj K, Cregar Laura C, Vitsky Allison, Beust Barbara von, Barlow Valerie G, Reagan William J, Ennulat Daniela

机构信息

1 Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

2 Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Pathol. 2017 Feb;45(2):260-266. doi: 10.1177/0192623316681646. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1177/0192623316681646
PMID:28056663
Abstract

There is limited direction in the literature or regulatory guidance on determination of adversity for clinical pathology (CP) biomarkers in preclinical safety studies. Toxicologic clinical pathologists representing the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology-Regulatory Affairs Committee and Society of Toxicologic Pathology-Clinical Pathology Interest Group identified principles, overall approach, and unique considerations for assessing adversity in CP data interpretation to provide a consensus opinion. Emphasized is the need for pathophysiologic context and a weight-of-evidence approach. Most CP biomarkers do not have the potential to be adverse in isolation, regardless of magnitude of change. Rather, they quantify or describe the impact of effects, provide adjunct or supportive information regarding a process or pathogenesis, and provide translational biomarkers of effect. Most often, CP changes are part of a constellation of findings that collectively are adverse. Thus, most CP changes must be interpreted in conjunction with other study findings and require contextual and integrative interpretation. Exceptions include critical CP changes without correlates that indicate a health risk in the tested species. Overall, CP changes should not be interpreted in isolation and their adversity is best addressed with an integrated approach.

摘要

在临床前安全性研究中,关于确定临床病理学(CP)生物标志物的有害性,文献或监管指南中提供的指导有限。代表美国兽医临床病理学会监管事务委员会和毒理病理学会临床病理兴趣小组的毒理临床病理学家确定了在CP数据解释中评估有害性的原则、总体方法和独特考量因素,以提供共识意见。强调了病理生理背景和证据权重方法的必要性。大多数CP生物标志物无论变化程度如何,孤立来看都没有产生有害影响的可能性。相反,它们量化或描述效应的影响,提供有关过程或发病机制的辅助或支持信息,并提供效应的转化生物标志物。大多数情况下,CP变化是一系列共同构成有害情况的发现的一部分。因此,大多数CP变化必须结合其他研究发现进行解释,需要进行背景和综合解释。例外情况包括无相关因素的关键CP变化,这些变化表明受试物种存在健康风险。总体而言,CP变化不应孤立地进行解释,其有害性最好通过综合方法来解决。

相似文献

1
Principles for Assessing Adversity in Toxicologic Clinical Pathology.毒理学临床病理学中不良事件评估原则
Toxicol Pathol. 2017 Feb;45(2):260-266. doi: 10.1177/0192623316681646. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
Best practices for veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology, with emphasis on the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries.兽医毒理学临床病理学的最佳实践,重点关注制药和生物技术行业。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;42(3):252-69. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12059. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
The American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology Regulatory Affairs Committee's clinical pathology best practices recommendations will impact the discipline of veterinary toxicologic clinical pathology.美国兽医临床病理学会监管事务委员会的临床病理学最佳实践建议将对兽医毒理学临床病理学学科产生影响。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;42(3):247-9. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12075.
4
Is It Adverse, Nonadverse, Adaptive, or Artifact?它是不良反应、非不良反应、适应性反应还是假象?
Toxicol Pathol. 2017 Jan;45(1):238-247. doi: 10.1177/0192623316672352. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
5
Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Commentary on "Opinion on Designation of Adverse and Nonadverse Histopathological Findings in Toxicity Studies: The Pathologist's Dilemma".毒理病理学论坛*:对《关于毒性研究中不良和非不良组织病理学发现的指定意见:病理学家的困境》的评论
Toxicol Pathol. 2019 Jul;47(5):574-576. doi: 10.1177/0192623319840355. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
6
Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider*: Review of Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Review of Current Practices for Ultrastructural Pathology Evaluations in Support of Nonclinical Toxicology Studies.科学与监管政策委员会需考虑的要点*:科学与监管政策委员会需考虑要点的回顾:支持非临床毒理学研究的超微结构病理学评估现行做法的回顾。
Toxicol Pathol. 2019 Jun;47(4):461-468. doi: 10.1177/0192623319835170. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Characterizing "Adversity" of Pathology Findings in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies: Results from the 4th ESTP International Expert Workshop.非临床毒性研究中病理学发现的“逆境”特征:第四届ESTP国际专家研讨会的结果
Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Aug;44(6):810-24. doi: 10.1177/0192623316642527. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
8
Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee: Recommended ("Best") Practices for Determining, Communicating, and Using Adverse Effect Data from Nonclinical Studies.科学与监管政策委员会:关于确定、传达和使用非临床研究不良事件数据的推荐(“最佳”)做法
Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Feb;44(2):147-62. doi: 10.1177/0192623315623265. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
STP Best Practices for Evaluating Clinical Pathology in Pharmaceutical Recovery Studies.药品回收研究中临床病理学评估的STP最佳实践
Toxicol Pathol. 2016 Feb;44(2):163-72. doi: 10.1177/0192623315624165. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
10
ASVCP Guidelines: Principles of Quality Assurance and Standards for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (version 3.0): Developed by the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology's (ASVCP) Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards (QALS) Committee.美国兽医临床病理学会指南:兽医临床病理学质量保证原则与标准(第3.0版):由美国兽医临床病理学会(ASVCP)质量保证与实验室标准(QALS)委员会制定。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;48(4):542-618. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12810.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Control Groups in Non-clinical Toxicity Studies: Impacts on Toxicologic Clinical Pathology Data Interpretation.非临床毒性研究中的虚拟对照组:对毒理学临床病理学数据解读的影响
Toxicol Pathol. 2025 Feb;53(2):164-172. doi: 10.1177/01926233241300310. Epub 2024 Nov 30.