• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[晚期表皮生长因子受体突变型肺腺癌患者外周血中可溶性程序性死亡-1配体1水平及其临床意义]

[Level of soluble programmed death-1 ligand 1 in peripheral blood of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated lung adenocarcinoma and its clinical implications].

作者信息

Zhang L Q, Chen Y, Pan X, Xing Y F, Shi M H, Chen Y J

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 27;96(48):3870-3874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.48.004.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.48.004
PMID:28057155
Abstract

To analyze the expression of soluble programmed death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) in the serum of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated lung adenocarcinoma and to explore its clinical implications. Seventy-two patients with EGFR mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR mutation group) were included from the Department of Respiratory Diseases in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from May 2015 to July 2016. Thirty-one patients with advanced EGFR wild type (WT) lung adenocarcinoma [EGFR WT group, diagnosed via mini specimens from bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy (TNAB), matching in sex, age and tumor stage with EGFR mutation group] were also enrolled as controls. The sPD-L1 protein expression in serum was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. According to the clinical response of two-month EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, all patients were divided into two groups: 36 cases in disease progression groups (PD group) and 36 cases in disease control group (DC group). The sPD-L1 level in peripheral blood between the two groups was analyzed. In EGFR mutation group, the relationship of serum sPD-L1 with TNM staging was analyzed. At the same time, the value of serum sPD-L1 and cancer embryo antigen (CEA) in clinical evaluation of advanced EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma was evaluated by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A lower level of sPD-L1 level in EGFR mutation group [0.75(0.15-2.78) μg/L] was found compared with the control group [1.56(0.85-3.29) μg/L] (<0.001). The expression of sPD-L1 in PD group was significantly higher than that in DC group [1.175(0.62-2.78) μg/L vs 0.625(0.15-2.27) μg/L, <0.001]. High expression of sPD-L1 in the serum of patients with advanced EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma was closely correlated to lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis (χ=10.985, 4.662; both <0.05). The area under ROC curve of serum sPD-L1 and CEA was 0.893 (95% 0.830-0.956) and 0.745(95% 0.652-0.839) respectively. Youden index was the maximum when the cutoff value of sPD-L1 was set to 0.815 μg/L, and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 91.4%, respectively. After EGFR-TKI treatment, the level of sPD-L1 in the serum of patients with advanced EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma is lower, which suggests that sPD-L1 expression may depend on the regulation of EGFR signaling pathway. The level of sPD-L1 can reflect the clinical response of EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma to EGFR-TKI.

摘要

分析晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变肺腺癌患者血清中可溶性程序性死亡配体1(sPD-L1)的表达,并探讨其临床意义。2015年5月至2016年7月,从苏州大学附属第二医院呼吸内科纳入72例EGFR突变的晚期肺腺癌患者(EGFR突变组)。另外纳入31例晚期EGFR野生型(WT)肺腺癌患者[EGFR WT组,通过支气管镜或经胸针吸活检(TNAB)的微量标本诊断,在性别、年龄和肿瘤分期方面与EGFR突变组匹配]作为对照。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试剂盒检测血清中sPD-L1蛋白表达。根据2个月EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的临床反应,将所有患者分为两组:疾病进展组(PD组)36例和疾病控制组(DC组)36例。分析两组外周血中sPD-L1水平。在EGFR突变组中,分析血清sPD-L1与TNM分期的关系。同时,通过分析受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估血清sPD-L1和癌胚抗原(CEA)在晚期EGFR突变肺腺癌临床评估中的价值。结果发现,EGFR突变组sPD-L1水平[0.75(0.15 - 2.78)μg/L]低于对照组[1.56(0.85 - 3.29)μg/L](<0.001)。PD组sPD-L1表达明显高于DC组[1.175(0.62 - 2.78)μg/L对0.625(0.15 - 2.27)μg/L,<0.001]。晚期EGFR突变肺腺癌患者血清中sPD-L1高表达与淋巴结转移和远处转移密切相关(χ=10.985,4.662;均<0.05)。血清sPD-L1和CEA的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.893(95% 0.830 - 0.956)和0.745(95% 0.652 - 0.839)。当sPD-L1的截断值设定为0.815 μg/L时,约登指数最大,敏感性和特异性分别为77.8%和91.4%。EGFR-TKI治疗后,晚期EGFR突变肺腺癌患者血清中sPD-L1水平降低,这表明sPD-L1表达可能依赖于EGFR信号通路的调节。sPD-L1水平可反映EGFR突变肺腺癌对EGFR-TKI的临床反应。

相似文献

1
[Level of soluble programmed death-1 ligand 1 in peripheral blood of patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated lung adenocarcinoma and its clinical implications].[晚期表皮生长因子受体突变型肺腺癌患者外周血中可溶性程序性死亡-1配体1水平及其临床意义]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 27;96(48):3870-3874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.48.004.
2
[The level of soluble programmed death-1 in peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer and its clinical implications].[肺癌患者外周血中可溶性程序性死亡受体1水平及其临床意义]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;35(2):102-6.
3
High PD-L1 expression correlates with primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in treatment naïve advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.高 PD-L1 表达与初治的 EGFR 突变型肺腺癌患者对 EGFR-TKIs 的原发性耐药相关。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Jan;127:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.11.021. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
mRNA expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 and components of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/phosphatase and tensin homolog pathway in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma.程序性细胞死亡配体1的mRNA表达以及磷脂酰肌醇3激酶/蛋白激酶B/张力蛋白同源物通路各组分在表皮生长因子受体突变阳性肺腺癌中的表达
J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(4):914-920. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_636_18.
5
[Effects of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and EGFR-TKI on the expression of PD-L1 and function of T lymphocytes in EGFR-mutated lung cancer cells].抗程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)单克隆抗体与表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变肺癌细胞中PD-L1表达及T淋巴细胞功能的影响
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 23;38(12):886-892. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.12.002.
6
Association between programmed death-ligand 1 expression, immune microenvironments, and clinical outcomes in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.程序性死亡配体 1 表达、免疫微环境与表皮生长因子受体突变型肺腺癌患者接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的临床结局的相关性。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:110-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
7
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression Predicts Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response and Better Prognosis in a Cohort of Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma.程序性死亡配体1表达可预测表皮生长因子受体突变阳性肺腺癌患者队列中酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的反应及更好的预后。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Sep;16(5):e25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
[Expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in lung adenocarcinoma and correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status].[程序性死亡受体1/程序性死亡配体1在肺腺癌中的表达及其与表皮生长因子受体突变状态的相关性]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Dec 8;45(12):854-858. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2016.12.008.
9
Increase in soluble PD-1 is associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.可溶性 PD-1 水平升高与接受厄洛替尼治疗的晚期 EGFR 突变型非小细胞肺癌患者的生存延长相关。
Lung Cancer. 2016 Oct;100:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
10
Changes in programmed death ligand 1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer patients who received anticancer treatments.接受抗癌治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者程序性死亡配体 1 表达的变化。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;23(6):1052-1059. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1305-4. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potential Role of sPD-L1 as a Predictive Biomarker in EGFR-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.可溶性程序性死亡配体1(sPD-L1)作为表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)阳性非小细胞肺癌预测生物标志物的潜在作用
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025 Jan 11;47(1):45. doi: 10.3390/cimb47010045.
2
The Evolving Landscape of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部肿瘤中 PD-1/PD-L1 通路的演变格局。
Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 18;11:1721. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01721. eCollection 2020.
3
In-depth plasma proteomics reveals increase in circulating PD-1 during anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
深度血浆蛋白质组学揭示转移性皮肤黑色素瘤患者在抗PD-1免疫治疗期间循环中PD-1增加。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000204.