Dhuru V B, Rypel T S, Johnston W M
J Dent Educ. 1978 Sep;42(9):528-31.
The object of this study was to evaluate instructor reliabilities when using empirical or traditional and criterion-oriented grading methods. To do so, 52 sample preparations made in plastic teeth by freshman dental students in the preclinical operative dentistry laboratory course were graded by 12 instructors. The preparations included those for amalgam, inlay, and gold foil restorations. The instructors were divided into two groups according to their teaching experience. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated by using a one way analysis of variance technique. The criterion method, in general, yielded greater intraclass correlation coefficients. The increase in the intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be significant at the alpha = 0.10 error level for all restorations judged by experienced instructors. The different degrees of increase in correlation may be attributed to the vary ing clinical biases of the instructors and the differences in the types of preparations.
本研究的目的是评估使用经验性或传统的以及基于标准的评分方法时教师评分的可靠性。为此,12名教师对牙科预科一年级学生在临床前牙体手术实验室课程中用塑料牙制作的52个样本进行了评分。这些样本包括用于汞合金、嵌体和金箔修复体的样本。教师们根据教学经验被分为两组。使用单因素方差分析技术计算组内相关系数。一般来说,基于标准的方法产生了更高的组内相关系数。对于有经验的教师评判的所有修复体,在α = 0.10的误差水平上,组内相关系数的增加被发现是显著的。相关系数增加程度的不同可能归因于教师不同的临床偏见以及样本类型的差异。