Sengul A, Rasier R, Ciftci C, Artunay O, Kockar A, Bahcecioglu H, Yuzbasioglu E
Departments of Ophtalmology, Istanbul Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Departments of Cardiology, Istanbul Bilim University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eye (Lond). 2017 May;31(5):677-683. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.305. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
PurposeTo evaluate effects of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab administration on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings in normotensive patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Patients and methodsA total of 72 patients (mean age: 61.8(6.2) years, 52.8% were females) diagnosed with AMD were included in this study as divided into ranibizumab (n=34) and bevacizumab (n=38) treatment groups. Twenty-four hour, nighttime, and daytime ABMP values for systolic and diastolic BP were recorded in study groups before and after the third intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or bevacizumab.ResultsRanibizumab injection had no impact on ABPM recordings and dipping status. In the bevacizumab group, increased daytime (129.0(6.6) vs 127.7(6.6) mm Hg, P=0.002) and nighttime systolic (116.9(7.5) vs 112.6(7.1) mmHg, p<0.001) BP and decreased daytime diastolic (80.1(6.5) vs 82.4(6.1)mm Hg, P=0.001) BP were noted in the post-injection period. Also, percentage of non-dippers was significantly increased from 5.3% at pre-injection to 28.9% (P=0.004) at the post-injection period.ConclusionIn conclusion, given that it has no significant impact on ABPM recordings and dipping status, in our study, intravitreal ranibizumab injection may be the better choice in the management of AMD.
目的
评估玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗对年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)正常血压患者动态血压监测(ABPM)记录的影响。
患者与方法
本研究共纳入72例诊断为AMD的患者(平均年龄:61.8(6.2)岁,52.8%为女性),分为雷珠单抗治疗组(n = 34)和贝伐单抗治疗组(n = 38)。在玻璃体内第三次注射雷珠单抗或贝伐单抗之前和之后,记录研究组收缩压和舒张压的24小时、夜间和白天ABMP值。
结果
雷珠单抗注射对ABPM记录和血压波动状态无影响。在贝伐单抗组中,注射后白天收缩压升高(129.0(6.6)vs 127.7(6.6)mmHg,P = 0.002)、夜间收缩压升高(116.9(7.5)vs 112.6(7.1)mmHg,p < 0.001),白天舒张压降低(80.1(6.5)vs 82.4(6.1)mmHg,P = 0.001)。此外,非勺型血压者的比例从注射前的5.3%显著增加到注射后的28.9%(P = 0.004)。
结论
总之,鉴于玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗对ABPM记录和血压波动状态无显著影响,在我们的研究中,玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗可能是AMD治疗的更好选择。