Caputo Antonio C, Pelagagge Pacifico M
a Department of Energetics, Faculty of Engineering , University of L'Aquila , L'Aquila , Italy.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999 Dec;49(12):1456-1462. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463971.
Cost-effectiveness of different plant solutions for glass furnace waste gas cleaning is compared in the present paper. Plant arrangements based on electrostatic precipi-tator or fabric filter dust collectors and wet, semi-dry, or dry processes for acid gas removal have been considered. A critical survey of each solution's advantages and disadvantages has been presented, taking into account both effectiveness and costs resulting from each available system. Finally, a quantitative assessment has been provided with reference to a case study involving actual float glass production lines at SIV plants located in northern and central Italy.
本文比较了不同植物解决方案用于玻璃熔炉废气净化的成本效益。考虑了基于静电除尘器或织物过滤除尘器的设备布置,以及用于酸性气体去除的湿式、半干式或干式工艺。对每种解决方案的优缺点进行了批判性审视,同时考虑了每个可用系统的有效性和成本。最后,针对意大利北部和中部SIV工厂实际浮法玻璃生产线的案例研究进行了定量评估。