Grimm Sabine E, Dixon Simon, Stevens John W
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands (SEG).
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (SD, JWS).
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):523-533. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16686766. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
With low implementation of cost-effective health technologies being a problem in many health systems, it is worth considering the potential effects of research on implementation at the time of health technology assessment. Meaningful and realistic implementation estimates must be of dynamic nature.
To extend existing methods for assessing the value of research studies in terms of both reduction of uncertainty and improvement in implementation by considering diffusion based on expert beliefs with and without further research conditional on the strength of evidence.
We use expected value of sample information and expected value of specific implementation measure concepts accounting for the effects of specific research studies on implementation and the reduction of uncertainty. Diffusion theory and elicitation of expert beliefs about the shape of diffusion curves inform implementation dynamics. We illustrate use of the resulting dynamic expected value of research in a preterm birth screening technology and results are compared with those from a static analysis.
Allowing for diffusion based on expert beliefs had a significant impact on the expected value of research in the case study, suggesting that mistakes are made where static implementation levels are assumed. Incorporating the effects of research on implementation resulted in an increase in the expected value of research compared to the expected value of sample information alone.
Assessing the expected value of research in reducing uncertainty and improving implementation dynamics has the potential to complement currently used analyses in health technology assessments, especially in recommendations for further research. The combination of expected value of research, diffusion theory, and elicitation described in this article is an important addition to the existing methods of health technology assessment.
在许多卫生系统中,具有成本效益的卫生技术实施率较低,因此在卫生技术评估时考虑研究对实施的潜在影响是值得的。有意义且现实的实施估计必须具有动态性质。
通过基于专家信念考虑扩散情况,并根据证据强度进行或不进行进一步研究,扩展现有方法,以评估研究在减少不确定性和改善实施方面的价值。
我们使用样本信息的期望值和特定实施措施的期望值概念,以考虑特定研究对实施的影响以及不确定性的减少。扩散理论和对专家关于扩散曲线形状的信念的引出为实施动态提供了信息。我们在早产筛查技术中说明了由此产生的研究动态期望值的使用情况,并将结果与静态分析的结果进行了比较。
在案例研究中,基于专家信念考虑扩散对研究的期望值有显著影响,这表明在假设静态实施水平时会出现错误。与仅考虑样本信息的期望值相比,纳入研究对实施的影响导致研究的期望值增加。
评估研究在减少不确定性和改善实施动态方面的期望值有可能补充目前在卫生技术评估中使用的分析,特别是在进一步研究的建议方面。本文所述的研究期望值、扩散理论和引出方法的结合是对现有卫生技术评估方法的重要补充。