Gujral S, Abbi R, Anderson M A, Christian P, Gopaldas T
Department of Foods & Nutrition, Faculty of Home Science, M.S. University of Baroda, India.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989 Jul;43(7):473-5.
Sensitivity and specificity of pallor signs were compared to haemoglobin determination for identifying nutritional anaemia in pregnant women. A total of 211 pregnant women were examined for signs of pallor using the anaemia recognition card, and their haemoglobin was determined by the cyanmethaemoglobin filter paper technique. The sensitivity of pallor signs in identifying severe nutritional anaemia in the population was fair, as 67 per cent of the pregnant women identified as anaemic by haemoglobin levels less than 8 g/dl were detected as anaemic by the presence of pallor signs. However, the specificity of the measure indicated that almost half of the pregnant women with haemoglobin level above 8 g/dl were misclassified as anaemic by presence of signs of pallor. Since the sensitivity and specificity of the pallor signs test are fairly low, the anaemia recognition card is an inefficient tool to be used to screen for severe cases of nutritional anaemia.
为识别孕妇的营养性贫血,对苍白体征的敏感性和特异性与血红蛋白测定结果进行了比较。使用贫血识别卡对总共211名孕妇进行了苍白体征检查,并采用氰化高铁血红蛋白滤纸技术测定了她们的血红蛋白。苍白体征在识别该人群中严重营养性贫血方面的敏感性一般,因为血红蛋白水平低于8 g/dl被判定为贫血的孕妇中,有67% 通过苍白体征被检测为贫血。然而,该测量方法的特异性表明,血红蛋白水平高于8 g/dl的孕妇中,几乎有一半因存在苍白体征而被误分类为贫血。由于苍白体征检测的敏感性和特异性相当低,贫血识别卡是筛查严重营养性贫血病例的低效工具。