Wildman-Tobriner Benjamin, Allen Brian C, Davis Joseph T, Miller Chad M, Schooler Gary R, McGreal Nancy M, Quevedo Reinaldo, Thacker Julie K, Jaffe Tracy A
Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.
Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Mar-Apr;46(2):110-114. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
To objectively compare the content of structured reports (SR) vs nonstructured reports (NSR) for magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease, and to evaluate referring clinicians' subjective assessment of reports.
This institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study included 25 pediatric subjects (15 male, 10 female; mean age = 14 years [range: 9-18 years]) with Crohn's disease imaged with MRE. Three radiologists independently interpreted all examinations using both NSR and SR, separated by 4 weeks. Reports were assessed for documentation of the presence or absence of 15 key reporting features. A total of 30 reports (15 NSR [5 per reader] and 15 SR [5 per reader]) were randomly selected for review by 3 referring physicians, who subjectively evaluated the reports independently.
NSR documented the presence or absence of 7.7 ± 2.5 key features, whereas SR documented 14.0 ± 0.8 features (P < 0.001). SR resulted in increased documentation of 12 of 15 features including stricture (P < 0.001), fistula (P < 0.001), fluid collection (P = 0.003), and perianal disease (P < 0.001). Referring physicians preferred SR regarding ease of information extraction, clarity of anatomy, and ability to identify disease phenotype (P < 0.01 for each).
The use of structured reporting in describing pediatric Crohn's disease, MRE resulted in significantly increased reporting of key features. Referring clinicians also demonstrated a subjective preference for SR.
客观比较克罗恩病患儿磁共振肠造影(MRE)结构化报告(SR)与非结构化报告(NSR)的内容,并评估转诊临床医生对报告的主观评价。
这项经机构审查委员会批准、符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的回顾性研究纳入了25例接受MRE检查的克罗恩病患儿(15例男性,10例女性;平均年龄 = 14岁[范围:9 - 18岁])。三名放射科医生分别使用NSR和SR独立解读所有检查,间隔4周。对报告中15项关键报告特征的有无记录情况进行评估。随机选择30份报告(15份NSR[每位读者5份]和15份SR[每位读者5份])供3位转诊医生审阅,他们各自独立对报告进行主观评价。
NSR记录了7.7 ± 2.5项关键特征的有无,而SR记录了14.0 ± 0.8项特征(P < 0.001)。SR使15项特征中的12项记录增加,包括狭窄(P < 0.001)、瘘管(P < 0.001)、液体积聚(P = 0.003)和肛周疾病(P < 0.001)。在信息提取的难易程度、解剖结构的清晰度以及识别疾病表型的能力方面,转诊医生更倾向于SR(每项P < 0.01)。
在描述小儿克罗恩病的MRE中使用结构化报告可显著增加关键特征的报告量。转诊临床医生也主观上更倾向于SR。