Ali Jawad T, Daley Mitchell J, Vadiei Nina, Enright Zachary, Nguyen Joseph, Ali Sadia, Aydelotte Jayson D, Teixeira Pedro G, Coopwood Thomas B, Brown Carlos Vr
Department of Trauma Services, University Medical Center Brackenridge, United States; Department of Surgery, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, United States.
Department of Pharmaceutical Services, University Medical Center Brackenridge, United States; College of Pharmacy, University of Texas at Austin, United States.
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):632-636. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.061. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Thromboelastography (TEG) has been recommended to characterize post-traumatic coagulopathy, yet no study has evaluated the impact of pre-injury anticoagulation (AC) on TEG variables. We hypothesized patients on pre-injury AC have a greater incidence of coagulopathy on TEG compared to those without AC.
This retrospective chart review evaluated all trauma patients admitted to an urban, level one trauma center from February 2011 to September 2014 who received a TEG within the first 24h. Patients were classified as receiving pre-injury AC or no AC if their documented medications prior to admission included warfarin, dabigatran, or anti-Xa (aXa) inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban). The presence of coagulopathy on TEG or conventional assays was defined by exceeding local laboratory reference standards.
A total of 54 patients were included (AC, n=27 [warfarin n=13, dabigatran n=6, aXa inhibitor n=8] vs. no AC, n=27). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, including age (72±13years vs. 72±15; p=0.85), male gender (70% vs. 74%; p=0.76) and blunt mechanism of injury (100% vs. 100%; p=1). There was no difference in the number of patients determined to have coagulopathy on TEG (no AC 11% vs. AC 15%; p=0.99). Conventional tests, including the international normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), identified coagulopathy in a high proportion of anti-coagulated patients (no AC 22% vs. AC 85%; p<0.01).
TEG has limited clinical utility to evaluate the presence of pre-injury AC. Traditional markers of drug induced coagulopathy should guide reversal decisions.
血栓弹力图(TEG)已被推荐用于描述创伤后凝血病,但尚无研究评估伤前抗凝(AC)对TEG变量的影响。我们假设,与未使用AC的患者相比,伤前使用AC的患者TEG检测出现凝血病的发生率更高。
这项回顾性图表审查评估了2011年2月至2014年9月间入住某城市一级创伤中心的所有创伤患者,这些患者在入院后24小时内接受了TEG检测。如果患者入院前记录的用药包括华法林、达比加群或抗Xa(aXa)抑制剂(阿哌沙班或利伐沙班),则被分类为接受伤前AC或未接受AC。TEG或传统检测中凝血病的存在通过超过当地实验室参考标准来定义。
共纳入54例患者(AC组,n = 27 [华法林组n = 13,达比加群组n = 6,aXa抑制剂组n = 8] vs. 未使用AC组,n = 27)。两组间的基线特征相似,包括年龄(72±13岁 vs. 72±15岁;p = 0.85)、男性比例(70% vs. 74%;p = 0.76)和钝性损伤机制(100% vs. 100%;p = 1)。TEG检测确定有凝血病的患者数量无差异(未使用AC组11% vs. AC组15%;p = 0.99)。包括国际标准化比值(INR)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)在内的传统检测在高比例的抗凝患者中检测到凝血病(未使用AC组22% vs. AC组85%;p<0.01)。
TEG在评估伤前AC的存在方面临床效用有限。药物诱导凝血病的传统标志物应指导逆转决策。