Suppr超能文献

创伤后即刻危及生命性凝血病的床边即时血栓弹力描记术处理的初步经验。

Initial experiences with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography for management of life-threatening postinjury coagulopathy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Anesthesia, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03264.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion (MTP) protocol design is hindered by lack of accurate assessment of coagulation. Rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) provides point-of-care (POC) analysis of clot formation. We designed a prospective study to test the hypothesis that integrating TEG into our MTP would facilitate goal-directed therapy and provide equivalent outcomes compared to conventional coagulation testing.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Thiry-four patients who received more than 6 units of red blood cells (RBCs)/6 hours who were admitted to our Level 1 trauma center after r-TEG implementation (TEG) were compared to 34 patients admitted prior to TEG implementation (Pre-TEG). Data are presented as mean±SEM.

RESULTS

Emergency department pre-TEG versus TEG shock, and coagulation indices, were not different: systolic blood pressure (94 mmHg vs. 101 mmHg), temperature (35.3°C vs. 35.9°C), pH (7.16 vs. 7.11), base deficit (-13.0 vs. -14.7), lactate (6.5 vs. 8.1), international normalized ratio (INR; 1.59 vs. 1.83), and partial thromboplastin time (48.3 vs. 57.9). Although not significant, patients with Injury Severity Score range 26 to 35 were more frequent in the pre-TEG group. Fresh-frozen plasma (FFP):RBCs, platelets:RBCs, and cryoprecipitate (cryo):RBC ratios were not significantly different at 6 or 12 hours. INR at 6 hours did not discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors (p=0.10), whereas r-TEG "G" value was significantly associated with survival (p=0.03), as was the maximum rate of thrombin generation (MRTG; mm/min) and total thrombin generation (TG; area under the curve) (p=0.03 for both). Patients with MRTG of more than 9.2 received significantly less components of RBCs, FFP, and cryo (p=0.048, p=0.03, and p=0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Goal-directed resuscitation via r-TEG appears useful for management of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Further experience with POC monitoring could result in more efficient management leading to a reduction of transfusion requirements.

摘要

背景

大量输血(MTP)方案的设计受到凝血评估不准确的阻碍。快速血栓弹力图(r-TEG)可提供即时检测(POC)的血凝块形成分析。我们设计了一项前瞻性研究,以测试以下假设:将 TEG 整合到我们的 MTP 中可以促进目标导向治疗,并提供与传统凝血检测相当的结果。

研究设计与方法

在实施 r-TEG(TEG)后入住我们的 1 级创伤中心的 34 名患者(TEG 组)超过 6 小时内接受了 6 个单位以上的红细胞(RBC)/6 小时,与在 TEG 实施前入院的 34 名患者(Pre-TEG 组)进行比较。数据表示为平均值±SEM。

结果

急诊室 TEG 前与 TEG 休克、凝血指数没有差异:收缩压(94mmHg 比 101mmHg)、体温(35.3°C 比 35.9°C)、pH 值(7.16 比 7.11)、碱缺失(-13.0 比-14.7)、乳酸(6.5 比 8.1)、国际标准化比值(INR;1.59 比 1.83)和部分凝血活酶时间(48.3 比 57.9)。尽管没有统计学意义,但 Pre-TEG 组的损伤严重程度评分范围为 26 至 35 的患者更为常见。新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)/RBC、血小板/RBC 和冷沉淀(cryo)/RBC 比值在 6 或 12 小时时无显著差异。6 小时的 INR 并不能区分幸存者和非幸存者(p=0.10),而 r-TEG“G”值与生存率显著相关(p=0.03),最大凝血酶生成速率(MRTG;mm/min)和总凝血酶生成(TG;曲线下面积)也是如此(p=0.03 用于两者)。MRTG 超过 9.2 的患者接受的 RBC、FFP 和 cryo 成分明显减少(p=0.048、p=0.03 和 p=0.04)。

结论

通过 r-TEG 进行目标导向复苏似乎可用于创伤性凝血病的管理。POC 监测的进一步经验可能会导致更有效的管理,从而减少输血需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验