• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“最佳情况/最差情况”:培训外科医生使用一种用于高风险急性外科问题的新型沟通工具。

"Best Case/Worst Case": Training Surgeons to Use a Novel Communication Tool for High-Risk Acute Surgical Problems.

作者信息

Kruser Jacqueline M, Taylor Lauren J, Campbell Toby C, Zelenski Amy, Johnson Sara K, Nabozny Michael J, Steffens Nicole M, Tucholka Jennifer L, Kwekkeboom Kris L, Schwarze Margaret L

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):711-719.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.014
PMID:28062349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5374034/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Older adults often have surgery in the months preceding death, which can initiate postoperative treatments inconsistent with end-of-life values. "Best Case/Worst Case" (BC/WC) is a communication tool designed to promote goal-concordant care during discussions about high-risk surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate a structured training program designed to teach surgeons how to use BC/WC.

METHODS

Twenty-five surgeons from one tertiary care hospital completed a two-hour training session followed by individual coaching. We audio-recorded surgeons using BC/WC with standardized patients and 20 hospitalized patients. Hospitalized patients and their families participated in an open-ended interview 30 to 120 days after enrollment. We used a checklist of 11 BC/WC elements to measure tool fidelity and surgeons completed the Practitioner Opinion Survey to measure acceptability of the tool. We used qualitative analysis to evaluate variability in tool content and to characterize patient and family perceptions of the tool.

RESULTS

Surgeons completed a median of 10 of 11 BC/WC elements with both standardized and hospitalized patients (range 5-11). We found moderate variability in presentation of treatment options and description of outcomes. Three months after training, 79% of surgeons reported BC/WC is better than their usual approach and 71% endorsed active use of BC/WC in clinical practice. Patients and families found that BC/WC established expectations, provided clarity, and facilitated deliberation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can learn to use BC/WC with older patients considering acute high-risk surgical interventions. Surgeons, patients, and family members endorse BC/WC as a strategy to support complex decision making.

摘要

背景

老年人常在死亡前几个月接受手术,这可能引发与临终价值观不一致的术后治疗。“最佳情况/最差情况”(BC/WC)是一种沟通工具,旨在在关于高风险手术的讨论中促进目标一致的护理。

目的

本研究的目的是评估一个结构化培训项目,该项目旨在教导外科医生如何使用BC/WC。

方法

来自一家三级医疗医院的25名外科医生完成了一次两小时的培训课程,随后接受个人辅导。我们对外科医生使用BC/WC与标准化病人及20名住院病人交流的过程进行了录音。住院病人及其家属在入组后30至120天参加了一次开放式访谈。我们使用一份包含11个BC/WC要素的清单来衡量工具的保真度,外科医生完成了从业者意见调查以衡量该工具的可接受性。我们使用定性分析来评估工具内容的变异性,并描述病人及家属对该工具的看法。

结果

外科医生在与标准化病人和住院病人交流时,11个BC/WC要素的中位数完成数为10个(范围为5 - 11)。我们发现治疗方案的呈现和结果的描述存在适度的变异性。培训三个月后,79%的外科医生报告称BC/WC比他们通常的方法更好,71%的人支持在临床实践中积极使用BC/WC。病人和家属发现BC/WC设定了期望,提供了清晰度,并促进了深思熟虑。

结论

对于考虑急性高风险外科干预的老年患者,外科医生可以学会使用BC/WC。外科医生、患者和家属都认可BC/WC作为支持复杂决策的一种策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/3ec6f8fa7d43/nihms840454f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/861b509529bf/nihms840454f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/7a416436a175/nihms840454f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/3ec6f8fa7d43/nihms840454f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/861b509529bf/nihms840454f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/7a416436a175/nihms840454f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd7/5374034/3ec6f8fa7d43/nihms840454f3.jpg

相似文献

1
"Best Case/Worst Case": Training Surgeons to Use a Novel Communication Tool for High-Risk Acute Surgical Problems.“最佳情况/最差情况”:培训外科医生使用一种用于高风险急性外科问题的新型沟通工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):711-719.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
2
A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.在高风险手术决策中改善外科医生沟通的框架:最佳情况/最差情况
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 1;152(6):531-538. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5674.
3
"Best Case/Worst Case": Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Communication Tool for Difficult in-the-Moment Surgical Decisions.“最佳情况/最差情况”:一种用于棘手的术中外科决策的新型沟通工具的定性评估
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1805-11. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13615. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Training surgical residents to use a framework to promote shared decision-making for patients with poor prognosis experiencing surgical emergencies.培训外科住院医师使用一个框架,以促进为预后不良且遭遇外科急症的患者进行共同决策。
Can J Surg. 2018 Apr;61(2):114-120. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011317.
5
Best case/worst case for the trauma ICU: Development and pilot testing of a communication tool for older adults with traumatic injury.创伤 ICU 的最佳/最差情况:用于创伤性损伤老年患者的沟通工具的开发和初步测试。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Sep 1;91(3):542-551. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003281.
6
Applying VitalTalk Techniques to Best Case/Worst Case Training to Increase Scalability and Improve Surgeon Confidence in Shared Decision-making.将 VitalTalk 技术应用于最佳病例/最差病例培训,以提高可扩展性并增强外科医生在共同决策中的信心。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Jul-Aug;79(4):983-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Opportunities to Improve Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Decisions for Older Adults with Life-Limiting Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study.改善老年终末期肾病患者透析决策中共享决策的机会:一项试点研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 May;23(5):627-634. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0340. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Communication Frameworks for Palliative Surgical Consultations: A Randomized Study of Advanced Cancer Patients.姑息性外科会诊的沟通框架:一项晚期癌症患者的随机研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e1110-e1117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005823. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
9
Barriers to Goal-concordant Care for Older Patients With Acute Surgical Illness: Communication Patterns Extrinsic to Decision Aids.老年急性外科疾病患者目标一致护理的障碍:决策辅助工具之外的沟通模式。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):677-682. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002282.
10
"You have to be sure that the patient has the full picture": Adaptation of the Best Case/Worst Case communication tool for geriatric oncology.“你必须确保患者全面了解情况”:老年肿瘤学中最佳情况/最差情况沟通工具的改编。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jun;13(5):606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.014. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study on Surgeon Perceptions of Risk Calculators in Emergency General Surgery.一项关于普通外科急诊手术中外科医生对风险计算器认知的定性研究。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Apr 21;6(2):e567. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000567. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Primary palliative care in acute care surgery: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee and Palliative Care Committee clinical consensus document.急性护理外科中的初级姑息治疗:美国创伤外科协会重症监护委员会和姑息治疗委员会临床共识文件
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Feb 4;10(1):e001616. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001616. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Surgeon Perception of Risk and Benefit in the Decision to Operate.外科医生在手术决策中对风险和益处的认知。
Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):896-903. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001784.
2
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.家庭对临终前积极癌症治疗的看法。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
3
Shared Decision Making--Finding the Sweet Spot.共同决策——找到最佳平衡点。
Should Physicians Take the Rap? Normative Analysis of Clinician Perspectives on Responsible Use of 'Black Box' AI Tools.
医生应该承担责任吗?对临床医生关于合理使用“黑匣子”人工智能工具观点的规范性分析。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 May 12:1-12. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2025.2497755.
4
Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review.终末期手术患者的姑息性预后工具:一项系统综述
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Jun;134(6):1648-1660. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.008. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
5
"We Were Still Left in the Back Field, Not Knowing": Pediatric Cancer Patients and Parents Describe Obstacles to Prognostic Communication.“我们仍被蒙在鼓里,一无所知”:儿科癌症患者及其父母描述预后沟通的障碍。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70810. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70810.
6
The Surgical Pause: The Importance of Measuring Frailty and Taking Action to Address Identified Frailty.手术暂停:评估虚弱程度并针对已发现的虚弱状况采取行动的重要性。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Mar;51(3):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.11.011. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
7
Common mistakes and evidence-based approaches in goals-of-care conversations for seriously ill older adults in cardiac care unit.心脏科重症监护病房老年重症患者进行临终关怀谈话中的常见错误及循证方法。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Aug 28;13(8):629-633. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae045.
8
Achieving Goals of Care Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study.实现慢性危重症患者的照护决策目标:一项多机构定性研究。
Chest. 2024 Jul;166(1):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.015. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Development and pilot testing a communication simulation training for interpreters to improve pain communication between primary care providers and patients with limited English proficiency.开发并初步测试一种针对口译员的沟通模拟培训,以改善初级保健提供者与英语水平有限的患者之间的疼痛沟通。
PEC Innov. 2023 Sep 20;3:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100217. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
10
Surgical Informed Consent: A Scoping Review of Physician-facing Decision Support Tools.手术知情同意书:面向医生的决策支持工具的范围综述
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jan 30;4(1):e259. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000259. eCollection 2023 Mar.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 14;374(2):104-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510020.
4
"Best Case/Worst Case": Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Communication Tool for Difficult in-the-Moment Surgical Decisions.“最佳情况/最差情况”:一种用于棘手的术中外科决策的新型沟通工具的定性评估
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Sep;63(9):1805-11. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13615. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
5
When Do Not Resuscitate Is a Nonchoice Choice: A Teachable Moment.当“不要复苏”成为一种别无选择的选择:一个可用于教学的时机。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1444-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2326.
6
"And I think that we can fix it": mental models used in high-risk surgical decision making.“我认为我们能够解决它”:高风险手术决策中使用的心理模型
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):678-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000714.
7
Constructing High-stakes Surgical Decisions: It's Better to Die Trying.构建高风险手术决策:尽力而为,死亦无憾。
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):64-70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001081.
8
Pitfalls in communication that lead to nonbeneficial emergency surgery in elderly patients with serious illness: description of the problem and elements of a solution.导致重症老年患者接受非必要急诊手术的沟通陷阱:问题描述与解决方案要素
Ann Surg. 2014 Dec;260(6):949-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000721.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
10
It's big surgery: preoperative expressions of risk, responsibility, and commitment to treatment after high-risk operations.这是大手术:高风险手术后表达风险、责任和治疗承诺的术前表现。
Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):458-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000314.