Ayala Adriana Areizaga, Farner Harmony, Mehler Shoshana, Christianson Caroline, Brinkman Tara M, Baker Justin N, Hinds Pamela S, Mack Jennifer W, Kaye Erica C
School of Medicine, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, Puerto Rico.
Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70810. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70810.
Patient/parent perceptions of poor-quality prognostic disclosure have not been well described, and these data offer important lessons to shape clinical practice and communication skills training. In this study, we aimed to characterize patient/parent negative experiences with prognostic communication to inform future efforts to improve how clinicians disclose prognosis.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of pediatric cancer patients (n = 25) and parents (n = 40) across different timepoints in the progressive illness course extending into bereavement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and de-identified for rapid qualitative analysis, in which multiple analysts used a standardized episode summary template to extract raw data specific to patient/parent narratives about prognostic disclosure experiences. Analysts engaged independently and collaboratively as a team in reflexive memo writing to identify negative experiences with prognostic communication, followed by team discussion to generate concepts and synthesize those concepts into themes.
More than half of participants (59%) described negative experiences with prognostic disclosure, with parents highlighting distressing communication experiences more often than patients (parents: 32/40, 80% vs. patients: 6/25, 24%). Across patient/parent narratives, three main themes underpinned the perception of poor-quality prognostic communication: (1) insufficient information, (2) overwhelming or contradictory information, and (3) absence of person-centered connection.
Many patients/parents perceived prognostic disclosure to be suboptimal and identified specific features underpinning poor-quality prognostic communication. These findings will inform future collaborative research with patients, parents, and multidisciplinary clinicians to codesign an intervention that individualizes prognostication to align with patient/parent preferences for receiving information and fostering connection.
患者/家长对预后信息披露质量差的看法尚未得到充分描述,这些数据为塑造临床实践和沟通技巧培训提供了重要经验教训。在本研究中,我们旨在描述患者/家长在预后沟通方面的负面经历,以为未来改善临床医生披露预后的方式提供参考。
对一组有目的抽样的儿科癌症患者(n = 25)和家长(n = 40)进行了半结构化访谈,访谈时间点涵盖疾病进展过程直至丧亲阶段的不同时期。访谈进行了录音、转录,并进行去识别处理以便进行快速定性分析,多名分析人员使用标准化的事件总结模板提取患者/家长关于预后披露经历叙述中的原始数据。分析人员独立且协作地进行反思性备忘录撰写,以识别预后沟通中的负面经历,随后进行团队讨论以生成概念并将这些概念综合成主题。
超过一半的参与者(59%)描述了预后披露方面的负面经历,家长比患者更频繁地强调令人痛苦的沟通经历(家长:32/40,80%;患者:6/25,24%)。在患者/家长的叙述中,三个主要主题构成了对预后沟通质量差的认知:(1)信息不足,(2)信息过多或相互矛盾,(3)缺乏以患者为中心的联系。
许多患者/家长认为预后披露不尽人意,并确定了导致预后沟通质量差的具体特征。这些发现将为未来与患者、家长和多学科临床医生的合作研究提供参考,以共同设计一种干预措施,使预后个性化,符合患者/家长接收信息和建立联系的偏好。