• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学相干断层扫描观察无保护左主干病变后左旋支开口处西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架血管反应的差异

Difference in vascular response between sirolimus-eluting- and everolimus-eluting stents in ostial left circumflex artery after unprotected left main as observed by optical coherence tomography.

作者信息

Fujino Yusuke, Attizzani Guilherme F, Tahara Satoko, Naganuma Toru, Takagi Kensuke, Yabushita Hiroto, Wang Wei, Tanaka Kentaro, Matsumoto Takahiro, Kawamoto Hiroyoshi, Yamada Yuya, Amano Shinnosuke, Watanabe Yusuke, Warisawa Takayuki, Sato Tomohiko, Mitomo Satoru, Kurita Naoyuki, Ishiguro Hisaaki, Hozawa Koji, Tsukahara Takahiro, Motosuke Masahiro, Bezerra Hiram G, Nakamura Shotaro, Nakamura Sunao

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.122. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.122
PMID:28065691
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kissing-balloon technique (KBT) is commonly performed during percutaneous coronary intervention of distal unprotected left main coronary artery (ULM) aiming at obtaining optimal opening of the side branch (left circumflex artery; LCX) ostium. Nonetheless, detailed evaluation of vascular response to stents in LCX ostium is lacking. We therefore evaluated the vascular response to different drug-eluting stents (DES) in ostial LCX after ULM by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 38 consecutive patients with ULM disease, who were treated with single-stent procedure using DES, crossover the ULM-left anterior descending artery (LAD) followed by KBT. Twelve patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 26 patients were treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EES). OCT was conducted at post-PCI and 9-month follow-up. We evaluated the DES-vessel interactions and number of stent struts at the side branch (LCX) ostium (SO) at post-PCI, and compared the narrowing of ostial area at LCX between SES and EES.

RESULTS

Post-procedure, the number of stent struts at SO was significantly higher in SES compared to EES (median 14.47% vs 0.19%, p<0.001). The narrowing of LCX ostial area at follow-up was more pronounced in SES compared with EES (29.16% vs 2.46%, respectively, p<0.001). Linear regression analysis showed a high correlation between the number of stent struts in LCX ostium and ostial area narrowing (r=0.771, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT showed differences between EES- and SES-vessel interactions at ULM bifurcation PCI. Number of LCX ostium struts at post-PCI impacted the narrowing of ostial area at 9-month follow-up.

摘要

背景

亲吻球囊技术(KBT)常用于无保护左主干冠状动脉(ULM)远端的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,旨在使边支(左旋支动脉;LCX)开口达到最佳开放状态。然而,目前缺乏对LCX开口处血管对支架反应的详细评估。因此,我们通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评估了ULM术后LCX开口处对不同药物洗脱支架(DES)的血管反应。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了38例连续的ULM疾病患者,这些患者接受了使用DES的单支架置入术,先跨过ULM-左前降支动脉(LAD),然后进行KBT。12例患者接受西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)治疗,26例患者接受依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)治疗。在PCI术后及9个月随访时进行OCT检查。我们评估了PCI术后DES与血管的相互作用以及边支(LCX)开口处(SO)的支架小梁数量,并比较了SES和EES之间LCX开口处面积的狭窄情况。

结果

术后,SES组SO处的支架小梁数量显著高于EES组(中位数分别为14.47%和0.19%,p<0.001)。随访时,SES组LCX开口处面积的狭窄比EES组更明显(分别为29.16%和2.46%,p<0.001)。线性回归分析显示,LCX开口处的支架小梁数量与开口处面积狭窄之间存在高度相关性(r=0.771,p<0.001)。

结论

OCT显示在ULM分叉处PCI时,EES与血管的相互作用和SES与血管的相互作用存在差异。PCI术后LCX开口处的支架小梁数量影响9个月随访时开口处面积的狭窄情况。

相似文献

1
Difference in vascular response between sirolimus-eluting- and everolimus-eluting stents in ostial left circumflex artery after unprotected left main as observed by optical coherence tomography.光学相干断层扫描观察无保护左主干病变后左旋支开口处西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架血管反应的差异
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.122. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
Serial assessment of vessel interactions after drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.应用频域光学相干断层成像术对无保护的左主干冠状动脉远端病变行药物洗脱支架置入后血管相互作用的连续评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1035-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.015.
3
Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.使用光学相干断层扫描比较西罗莫司洗脱支架和依维莫司洗脱支架的新生内膜覆盖情况及支架外管腔情况。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Apr;31(4):449-56. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0630-z. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.在猪冠状动脉再狭窄模型中,新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架与氟聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相比的类似血管反应。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(6):657-666. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2016.0108.
5
Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与永久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架9个月随访时的血管反应:来自CENTURY II试验的光学相干断层扫描子研究
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;17(1):34-40. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev203. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Differences in Vessel Healing Between Sirolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Bifurcation Lesions: The J-REVERSE Optical Coherence Tomography Substudy.西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架植入治疗分叉病变的血管愈合差异:J-REVERSE光学相干断层扫描亚研究
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Mar;32(3):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.029. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Impact of different stent alloys on human vascular response to everolimus-eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study: the OCTEVEREST.不同支架合金对依维莫司洗脱支架后人体血管反应的影响:光学相干断层扫描研究:OCTEVEREST。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(3):510-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24374. Epub 2012 May 2.
8
Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.腔内沟槽填充型可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的长期支架内血管反应比较:来自TARGET I试验的3年光学相干断层扫描随访
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;31(8):1489-96. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0721-z. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的新生内膜覆盖率比较:RESET 试验(西罗莫司洗脱支架与依维莫司洗脱支架随机评价试验)的光学相干断层成像子研究。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Sep;11(5):564-71. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I5A109.
10
Prospective randomized comparison of sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions by provisional approach.前瞻性随机比较西罗莫司或依维莫司洗脱支架与预适应技术治疗分叉病变。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar;4(3):327-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing single-stent techniques for isolated left anterior descending ostial disease: a two-year intravascular ultrasound-guided retrospective comparison of precise ostial, floating, and crossover stenting strategies.重新评估孤立性左前降支开口病变的单支架技术:一项为期两年的血管内超声引导下精确开口、漂浮和交叉支架置入策略的回顾性比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04894-3.
2
Composite outcomes of drug-coated balloon using in left main bifurcation lesions: a systematic review.药物涂层球囊用于左主干分叉病变的复合结局:一项系统评价。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Nov 28;21(11):1047-1059. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.11.001.
3
Artificial Intelligence for the Interventional Cardiologist: Powering and Enabling OCT Image Interpretation.
介入心脏病专家的人工智能:助力并实现光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像解读
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Mar 11;19:e03. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.13. eCollection 2024.
4
How to use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography effectively in coronary bifurcation stenting.如何在冠状动脉分叉支架置入术中有效使用三维光学相干断层扫描技术。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 11;9:1023834. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1023834. eCollection 2022.
5
Impact of directional coronary atherectomy followed by drug-coated balloon strategy to avoid the complex stenting for bifurcation lesions.药物涂层球囊治疗策略避免复杂支架置入术治疗分叉病变后定向冠状动脉斑块切除术的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jun;37(6):919-930. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02000-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
6
Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs.韩国和日本冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗基本概念的差异。来自韩国和日本分叉俱乐部专家问卷调查的启示。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jan;37(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00742-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
7
Efficacy of coronary imaging on bifurcation intervention.冠状动脉分叉病变介入治疗的疗效。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):54-66. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00701-2. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
A case of very late stent thrombosis on the protruded struts at the left main coronary bifurcation.1例发生于左主干冠状动脉分叉处突出支架小梁的极晚期支架内血栓形成。
J Cardiol Cases. 2020 May 14;22(1):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2020.04.007. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Effect of proximal balloon edge dilation technique for opening a side branch ostium in repetitive-proximal optimizing technique sequence.近端球囊边缘扩张技术在重复近端优化技术序列中开通侧支开口的效果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):E12-E18. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28926. Epub 2020 Apr 24.