• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注差距:读写能力有助于提高儿童阅读学习中的词汇切分能力。

Minding the gaps: literacy enhances lexical segmentation in children learning to read.

作者信息

Havron Naomi, Arnon Inbal

机构信息

Hebrew University of Jerusalem,Israel.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2017 Nov;44(6):1516-1538. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000623. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1017/S0305000916000623
PMID:28067186
Abstract

Can emergent literacy impact the size of the linguistic units children attend to? We examined children's ability to segment multiword sequences before and after they learned to read, in order to disentangle the effect of literacy and age on segmentation. We found that early readers were better at segmenting multiword units (after controlling for age, cognitive, and linguistic variables), and that improvement in literacy skills between the two sessions predicted improvement in segmentation abilities. Together, these findings suggest that literacy acquisition, rather than age, enhanced segmentation. We discuss implications for models of language learning.

摘要

早期读写能力会影响儿童关注的语言单位的大小吗?我们研究了儿童在学习阅读前后对多词序列进行切分的能力,以厘清读写能力和年龄对切分的影响。我们发现,早期阅读者在切分多词单位方面表现更好(在控制了年龄、认知和语言变量之后),并且两次测试之间读写能力的提高预示着切分能力的提高。这些发现共同表明,是读写能力的获得而非年龄增强了切分能力。我们讨论了这些发现对语言学习模型的启示。

相似文献

1
Minding the gaps: literacy enhances lexical segmentation in children learning to read.关注差距:读写能力有助于提高儿童阅读学习中的词汇切分能力。
J Child Lang. 2017 Nov;44(6):1516-1538. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000623. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Parents' early book reading to children: Relation to children's later language and literacy outcomes controlling for other parent language input.父母早期给孩子读书:在控制其他父母语言输入的情况下,与孩子以后的语言和读写能力的关系。
Dev Sci. 2019 May;22(3):e12764. doi: 10.1111/desc.12764. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Literacy acquisition in multilingual educational contexts: Evidence from Coastal Kenya.多语言教育环境中的读写能力习得:来自肯尼亚沿海地区的证据。
Dev Sci. 2019 Sep;22(5):e12828. doi: 10.1111/desc.12828. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Learning to read changes children's phonological skills: evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study of reading and nonword repetition.学习阅读改变儿童的语音技能:来自阅读和非词重复的潜在变量纵向研究的证据。
Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):649-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01008.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
5
More Than Words: The Role of Multiword Sequences in Language Learning and Use.不止于词汇:多词序列在语言学习与运用中的作用
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):542-551. doi: 10.1111/tops.12274. Epub 2017 May 14.
6
Formal and informal home learning activities in relation to children's early numeracy and literacy skills: the development of a home numeracy model.与儿童早期数学和读写技能相关的正式和非正式家庭学习活动:家庭数学模型的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.006. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
7
Early preschool processing abilities predict subsequent reading outcomes in bilingual Spanish-Catalan children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI).早期学前加工能力可预测患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的西班牙语 - 加泰罗尼亚语双语儿童随后的阅读成绩。
J Commun Disord. 2014 Jul-Aug;50:19-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: evidence from a longitudinal study.希腊语阅读和拼写学习的认知基础:一项纵向研究的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 May;94(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jan 5.
9
Linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.阅读者与非阅读者的语言和认知技能。
Pro Fono. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):113-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005.
10
Lexical restructuring in the absence of literacy.缺乏读写能力情况下的词汇重组。
Cognition. 2007 Nov;105(2):334-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Do current statistical learning tasks capture stable individual differences in children? An investigation of task reliability across modality.当前的统计学习任务能否捕捉到儿童稳定的个体差异?对跨模态任务可靠性的调查。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):68-81. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01205-5.