Pecoraro Felice, Krishnaswamy Mayur, Steuer Johnny, Puippe Gilbert, Mangialardi Nicola, Pfammatter Thomas, Rancic Zoran, Veith Frank J, Cayne Neal S, Lachat Mario
1 Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vascular. 2017 Aug;25(4):396-401. doi: 10.1177/1708538116688786. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Purpose Percutaneous remote access for endovascular aortic repair is an advantageous alternative to open access. Previous surgery in the femoral region and the presence of synthetic vascular grafts in the femoral/iliac arteries represent major limitations to percutaneous remote access. The aim of this study was to evaluate an original technique used for enabling percutaneous remote access for thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair in patients with scar tissue and/or a vascular graft in the groin. Methods Twenty-five consecutive patients with a thoracic (11/25; 44%) or an aortic aneurysm (14/25; 66%) and with a synthetic vascular graft in the groin (16/25; 64%) or a redo groin access (9/25; 36%) were managed through the percutaneous remote access. In all patients, a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used to predilate the scar tissue and the femoral artery or the synthetic vascular graft after preclosing (ProGlide®; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In 10 patients, requiring a 20 Fr sheath, a 6 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used; and in the remaining 15, requiring a 24 Fr sheath, an 8 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon. Preclosing was exclusively performed using ProGlide®. Mean follow-up was 15 months. Results In all cases, stent-graft deployment was successful. There was one surgical conversion (4%; 1/25) due to bleeding from a femoral anastomosis. Two cases required additional percutaneous maneuvers (postclosing with another system in one patient and endoluminal shielding with stent-graft in the other patient). No pseudoaneurysm or access complication occurred during the follow-up. Conclusions Percutaneous access in redo groins with scar tissue and/or synthetic vascular graft using ultrasound-guided punction, preclosing with ProGlide® system and predilation with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon to introduce large size sheath as used for endovascular aortic repair showed to be feasible, safe and with few local complications.
目的 经皮远程入路用于血管腔内主动脉修复术是开放入路的一种有利替代方法。股部既往手术以及股/髂动脉中存在人工血管移植物是经皮远程入路的主要限制因素。本研究的目的是评估一种用于在腹股沟有瘢痕组织和/或血管移植物的患者中实现经皮远程入路进行胸段或腹段血管腔内主动脉修复术的原创技术。方法 连续25例患有胸主动脉瘤(11/25;44%)或腹主动脉瘤(14/25;66%)且腹股沟有人工血管移植物(16/25;64%)或再次腹股沟入路(9/25;36%)的患者通过经皮远程入路进行治疗。在所有患者中,在预闭合(美国加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉市雅培血管公司的ProGlide®)后,使用经皮腔内血管成形术球囊对瘢痕组织以及股动脉或人工血管移植物进行预扩张。10例需要20 Fr鞘管的患者使用6 mm经皮腔内血管成形术球囊;其余15例需要24 Fr鞘管的患者使用8 mm经皮腔内血管成形术球囊。预闭合仅使用ProGlide®进行。平均随访时间为15个月。结果 在所有病例中,支架移植物植入均成功。因股动脉吻合口出血导致1例手术中转(4%;1/25)。2例患者需要额外的经皮操作(1例患者使用另一系统进行后闭合,另1例患者使用支架移植物进行腔内屏蔽)。随访期间未发生假性动脉瘤或入路相关并发症。结论 使用超声引导穿刺、ProGlide®系统预闭合以及经皮腔内血管成形术球囊预扩张以引入用于血管腔内主动脉修复术的大尺寸鞘管,在有瘢痕组织和/或人工血管移植物的再次腹股沟入路中进行经皮入路显示是可行、安全的,且局部并发症较少。