• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者在“覆盖加州”计划中购买低成本保险方案,这表明他们面临的保费上涨幅度低于普遍报道的水平。

Consumers Buy Lower-Cost Plans On Covered California, Suggesting Exposure To Premium Increases Is Less Than Commonly Reported.

作者信息

Gabel Jon R, Arnold Daniel R, Fulton Brent D, Stromberg Sam T, Green Matthew, Whitmore Heidi, Scheffler Richard M

机构信息

Jon R. Gabel (

Daniel R. Arnold is a graduate student researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, and a doctoral student in economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):8-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0902.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0902
PMID:28069841
Abstract

With the notable exception of California, states have not made enrollment data for their Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace plans publicly available. Researchers thus have tracked premium trends by calculating changes in the average price for plans offered (a straight average across plans) rather than for plans purchased (a weighted average). Using publicly available enrollment data for Covered California, we found that the average purchased price for all plans was 11.6 percent less than the average offered price in 2014, 13.2 percent less in 2015, and 15.2 percent less in 2016. Premium growth measured by plans purchased was roughly 2 percentage points less than when measured by plans offered in 2014-15 and 2015-16. We observed shifts in consumer choices toward less costly plans, both between and within tiers, and we estimate that a $100 increase in a plan's net annual premium reduces its probability of selection. These findings suggest that the Marketplaces are helping consumers moderate premium cost growth.

摘要

除加利福尼亚州外,其他州并未公开其《平价医疗法案》(ACA)市场计划的参保数据。因此,研究人员通过计算所提供计划的平均价格变化(各计划的直接平均价格)而非购买计划的价格变化(加权平均价格)来追踪保费趋势。利用加利福尼亚州医保局公开的参保数据,我们发现,2014年所有计划的平均购买价格比平均提供价格低11.6%,2015年低13.2%,2016年低15.2%。2014 - 2015年和2015 - 2016年期间,按购买计划衡量的保费增长比按提供计划衡量的保费增长大约低2个百分点。我们观察到消费者的选择转向了成本较低的计划,无论是在不同层级之间还是在同一层级内,并且我们估计,一项计划的年度净保费每增加100美元,其被选中的概率就会降低。这些发现表明,医保市场正在帮助消费者缓解保费成本的增长。

相似文献

1
Consumers Buy Lower-Cost Plans On Covered California, Suggesting Exposure To Premium Increases Is Less Than Commonly Reported.消费者在“覆盖加州”计划中购买低成本保险方案,这表明他们面临的保费上涨幅度低于普遍报道的水平。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):8-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0902.
2
An Early Look At SHOP Marketplaces: Low Premiums, Adequate Plan Choice In Many, But Not All, States.早期观察SHOP市场:保费较低,在许多(但并非所有)州有足够的保险计划选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):732-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1370.
3
Grandfathered, Grandmothered, And ACA-Compliant Health Plans Have Equivalent Premiums.祖父辈、祖母辈和符合 ACA 的健康计划的保费相同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Feb 1;36(2):306-310. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0895.
4
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
5
Americans' Experiences with ACA Marketplace Coverage: Affordability and Provider Network Satisfaction: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey, February--April 2016.美国人参与《平价医疗法案》市场医保覆盖计划的经历:可负担性与医保服务网络满意度——来自联邦基金《平价医疗法案》追踪调查(2016年2月至4月)的结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jul;17:1-20.
6
Marketplace Plans Provide Risk Protection, But Actuarial Values Overstate Realized Coverage For Most Enrollees.市场计划提供风险保护,但对于大多数参保人来说,精算值夸大了实际保障范围。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Dec;36(12):2078-2084. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0660.
7
What are consumers willing to pay for a broad network health plan?: Evidence from covered California.消费者愿意为广泛的网络健康计划支付多少费用?:来自加州保险市场的证据。
J Health Econ. 2019 May;65:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
When All That Glitters Is Gold: Dominated Plan Choice on Covered California for the 2018 Plan Year.当所有的闪光都是金子:2018 计划年度加州保险交易所的主导计划选择。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1059-1087. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12518. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
How the ACA's Health Insurance Expansions Have Affected Out-of-Pocket Cost-Sharing and Spending on Premiums.《平价医疗法案》的医疗保险扩张如何影响自付费用分担和保费支出。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Sep;28:1-16.
10
Marketplace Plans With Narrow Physician Networks Feature Lower Monthly Premiums Than Plans With Larger Networks.与拥有较大医生网络的保险计划相比,拥有狭窄医生网络的市场保险计划月保费更低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Oct 1;35(10):1842-1848. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0693.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between a Capitated, Low-cost, County-Based Public Health Insurance Option and Affordable Care Act Premium Growth in California.基于人头、低成本、县级的公共医疗保险选择与加利福尼亚平价医疗法案保费增长之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230488. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0488.
2
Turnover in Zero-Premium Status Among Health Insurance Marketplace Plans Available to Low-Income Enrollees.医保市场计划中零保费参保者的参保流动率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 22;3(4):e220674. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0674. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Individual market health plan affordability after cost-sharing reduction subsidy cuts.
个户医保计划在自付减免补贴削减后的负担能力。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):730-738. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13190. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
Lessons Learned From the Affordable Care Act: The Premium Subsidy Design May Promote Adverse Selection.从《平价医疗法案》中吸取的教训:保费补贴设计可能会助长逆向选择。
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Dec;75(6):762-772. doi: 10.1177/1077558717703165. Epub 2017 May 4.