*Biedermann Lab for Orthopaedic Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; and ‡Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 May;31(5):275-280. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000780.
This study sought to examine fatigue characteristics of 2 polyaxial locking screw designs: locking cap (LC) and cross-threaded (CT). The goal was to compare LC and CT implants at 0, 10, and 15 degrees of angulation to determine the effect of locking mechanism on screw-plate interface failure. The hypothesis was that LC implants would have superior fatigue properties in comparison to CT designs and that increased angulation of the screw would have a negative impact on the fatigue life of CT implants, but would not have any effect on LC implants.
A total of 72 screws were tested in 4 upper extremity implants. Implants were subjected to cyclic shear loads and subsequent ramp to failure. Performance characteristics were statistically compared using nonparametric statistical methods.
Fatigue testing demonstrated that LC designs were consistently able to sustain a significantly higher number of cyclic loads than CT designs. There were no significant differences in the number of cycles sustained by LC designs because of changes in screw angle, but CT implants exhibited decreases in screw stability with increasing angulation.
Likely because of the spherical screw head geometry, LC fatigue characteristics are not influenced by the orientation of the screw relative to the plate. Application of an LC in the operating room requires additional time, but provides significantly more robust fixation of the screw, especially at oblique angles to the plate and provides a more predictable and consistent biomechanical result.
本研究旨在研究两种多轴锁定螺钉设计(锁定帽[LC]和螺纹交叉[CT])的疲劳特性。目的是比较 0、10 和 15 度角的 LC 和 CT 植入物,以确定锁定机制对螺钉-板界面失效的影响。假设是 LC 植入物的疲劳性能优于 CT 设计,并且螺钉的角度增加会对 CT 植入物的疲劳寿命产生负面影响,但对 LC 植入物没有任何影响。
总共对 4 个上肢植入物中的 72 个螺钉进行了测试。植入物经受循环剪切载荷和随后的斜坡至失效。使用非参数统计方法对性能特征进行了统计学比较。
疲劳测试表明,LC 设计能够持续承受明显更高数量的循环载荷,而 CT 设计则不能。由于螺钉角度的变化,LC 设计的循环次数没有显著差异,但 CT 植入物的螺钉稳定性随着角度的增加而降低。
可能由于球形螺钉头几何形状,LC 的疲劳特性不受螺钉相对于板的方向的影响。在手术室中应用 LC 需要额外的时间,但可显著增强螺钉的固定,特别是在与板成斜角的情况下,并且可提供更可预测和一致的生物力学结果。