Beinert Konstantin, Mouthon Audrey, Keller Martin, Mouthon Michael, Annoni Jean-Marie, Taube Wolfgang
University of Fribourg, Switzerland and Hochschule für Gesundheitsorientierte Medizin und Bewegungswissenschaft i.Gr, Germany.
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E115-E125.
Chronic neck pain patients display functional impairments like decreased range of motion, decreased strength, and reduced sensorimotor function. In patients without structural damage, the reason for the persistence of pain is not well understood. Therefore, it is assumed that in chronic pain states, memory processes play an important role. We have now detected and tested a patient that might help us to better understand the neural correlates of maladaptive pain expectation/memory. This patient displays chronic neck pain and restricted unilateral motion of the cervical spine to the left. However, when the patient is distracted, she can perform head rotations without experiencing pain and without restricting her range of movement. Based on this observation, we asked her to imagine movements shown in a video: conscious, non-distracted head rotations (pain-provoking) versus distracted head rotations (pain-free) and compared these results with an age and gender matched control volunteer. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed distinct brain activation patterns that depended on the side of rotation (pain-free versus painful side) and the kind of movement (distracted versus non-distracted head rotation). Interestingly, brain areas related to the processing of pain such as primary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate cortex were always more strongly activated in the non-distracted condition and when turning to the left. The age and gender matched control volunteer displayed no comparable activation of pain centers. In the patient, maladaptive pain behavior and the activity of pain-related brain areas during imagined head rotations were task-specific, indicating that the activation and/or recall of pain memories were context-dependent. These findings are important not only to improve the understanding of the neural organization of maladaptive pain behavior but also to reconsider clinical evaluation and treatment strategies. The current results therefore suggest that treatment strategies have to take into account and exploit the context in which the movement is performed.Key words: Maladaptive pain behavior, pain memory, brain plasticity, motor control, neck pain, fMRI, action observation, motor imagery.
慢性颈部疼痛患者表现出功能障碍,如活动范围减小、力量减弱和感觉运动功能下降。在没有结构损伤的患者中,疼痛持续存在的原因尚不清楚。因此,人们认为在慢性疼痛状态下,记忆过程起着重要作用。我们现在检测并测试了一名患者,他可能有助于我们更好地理解适应不良性疼痛预期/记忆的神经关联。该患者表现为慢性颈部疼痛,颈椎向左侧的单侧活动受限。然而,当患者注意力分散时,她可以进行头部旋转,而不会感到疼痛,也不会限制其活动范围。基于这一观察结果,我们让她想象视频中展示的动作:有意识的、未分散注意力的头部旋转(引发疼痛)与分散注意力的头部旋转(无疼痛),并将这些结果与年龄和性别匹配的对照志愿者进行比较。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)显示出不同的脑激活模式,这取决于旋转的方向(无痛与疼痛侧)和运动的类型(分散注意力与未分散注意力的头部旋转)。有趣的是,与疼痛处理相关的脑区,如初级体感皮层、丘脑、脑岛、前扣带回皮层、初级运动皮层、辅助运动区、前额叶皮层和后扣带回皮层,在未分散注意力的情况下以及向左转动时总是被更强烈地激活。年龄和性别匹配的对照志愿者没有表现出类似的疼痛中心激活。在该患者中,适应不良性疼痛行为以及想象头部旋转期间与疼痛相关的脑区活动是特定于任务的,这表明疼痛记忆的激活和/或回忆是依赖于情境的。这些发现不仅对于增进对适应不良性疼痛行为的神经组织的理解很重要,而且对于重新考虑临床评估和治疗策略也很重要。因此,目前的结果表明,治疗策略必须考虑并利用进行运动时的情境。关键词:适应不良性疼痛行为、疼痛记忆、脑可塑性、运动控制、颈部疼痛、功能磁共振成像、动作观察、运动想象。