Taube Wolfgang, Mouthon Michael, Leukel Christian, Hoogewoud Henri-Marcel, Annoni Jean-Marie, Keller Martin
Department of Medicine, Movement and Sport Science, University of Fribourg, Switzerland.
Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Sciences, University and Hospital of Fribourg, Switzerland.
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:102-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
After immobilization, patients show impaired postural control and increased risk of falling. Therefore, loss of balance control should already be counteracted during immobilization. Previously, studies have demonstrated that both motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) can improve motor performance. The current study elaborated how the brain is activated during imagination and observation of different postural tasks to provide recommendations about the conception of non-physical balance training. For this purpose, participants were tested in a within-subject design in an fMRI-scanner in three different conditions: (a) AO + MI, (b) AO, and (c) MI. In (a) participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the person pictured in the video whereas in (b) they were instructed simply to watch the video. In (c) subjects closed their eyes and kinesthetically imagined the task displayed in the video. Two tasks were evaluated in each condition: (i) static standing balance and (ii) dynamic standing balance (medio-lateral perturbation). In all conditions the start of a new trial was indicated every 2 sec by a sound. During AO + MI of the dynamic task, participants activated motor centers including the putamen, cerebellum, supplementary motor area, premotor cortices (PMv/d) and primary motor cortex (M1). MI showed a similar pattern but no activity in M1 and PMv/d. In the SMA and cerebellum, activity was generally higher in the dynamic than in the static condition. AO did not significantly activate any of these brain areas. Our results showed that (I) mainly AO + MI, but also MI, activate brain regions important for balance control; (II) participants display higher levels of brain activation in the more demanding balance task; (III) there is a significant difference between AO + MI and AO. Consequently, best training effects should be expected when participants apply MI during AO (AO + MI) of challenging postural tasks.
固定后,患者会出现姿势控制受损和跌倒风险增加的情况。因此,在固定期间就应抵消平衡控制能力的丧失。此前,研究表明运动想象(MI)和动作观察(AO)都可以改善运动表现。当前的研究详细阐述了在想象和观察不同姿势任务时大脑是如何被激活的,以便为非物理平衡训练的构想提供建议。为此,参与者在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中接受了一项被试内设计的测试,测试分为三种不同条件:(a)动作观察+运动想象(AO+MI),(b)动作观察(AO),以及(c)运动想象(MI)。在(a)组中,参与者被要求想象自己是视频中所描绘的人,而在(b)组中,他们只需观看视频。在(c)组中,受试者闭上眼睛,通过动觉想象视频中展示的任务。每种条件下评估两项任务:(i)静态站立平衡和(ii)动态站立平衡(左右扰动)。在所有条件下,每隔2秒会通过声音提示新试验开始。在动态任务的动作观察+运动想象过程中,参与者激活了包括壳核、小脑、辅助运动区、运动前皮质(PMv/d)和初级运动皮质(M1)在内的运动中枢。运动想象呈现出类似的模式,但M1和PMv/d没有活动。在辅助运动区和小脑中,动态条件下的活动通常高于静态条件。动作观察并未显著激活这些脑区中的任何一个。我们的结果表明:(I)主要是动作观察+运动想象,但运动想象也能激活对平衡控制很重要的脑区;(II)参与者在要求更高的平衡任务中表现出更高水平的脑激活;(III)动作观察+运动想象和动作观察之间存在显著差异。因此,当参与者在具有挑战性的姿势任务的动作观察(AO+MI)过程中应用运动想象时,有望获得最佳训练效果。