Tsou Amy Y, Lehmann Christoph U, Michel Jeremy, Solomon Ronni, Possanza Lorraine, Gandhi Tejal
Amy Y. Tsou, MD, MSc, Health Technology Assessment Group, AHRQ ECRI-Penn Evidence Based Practice Center (EPC), ECRI Institute, 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1298,
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 11;8(1):12-34. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150.
Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT).
To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste.
The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices.
The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66% to 90% of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6% of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review.
Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.
复制粘贴功能有助于提高临床文档记录的效率,但可能导致记录不准确,对患者安全构成风险。健康信息技术患者安全合作组织的成立旨在收集数据、进行分析、开展教育,并传播利用健康信息技术(IT)实现更安全医疗的安全实践。
描述临床护理中的复制粘贴事件,识别安全风险,描述现有证据,并制定可实施的实践建议,以确保通过复制粘贴安全地重复使用信息。
该合作组织1)审查了12起报告的安全事件,2)征求了专家意见,3)进行了系统的文献综述(2010年至2015年1月),以确定涉及频率、认知/态度、患者安全风险、现有指南以及潜在干预措施和缓解措施的出版物。
文献综述纳入了51篇出版物。总体而言,66%至90%的临床医生经常使用复制粘贴功能。一项关于诊断错误的研究发现,复制粘贴导致2.6%的错误,其中漏诊需要患者寻求额外的非计划护理。复制粘贴会导致记录冗长、内部不一致、错误传播以及在错误的患者病历中进行记录。现有指南明确了作者、组织和电子健康记录(EHR)开发者的具体职责。对12起报告的复制粘贴安全事件的分析与文献综述中发现的问题一致。
尽管经常使用复制粘贴功能,但关于对患者安全的直接风险的证据仍然稀少,且存在重大研究局限性。基于现有证据,该合作组织制定了四项安全实践建议:1)提供一种机制,使复制粘贴的材料易于识别;2)确保复制粘贴材料的来源易于获取;3)确保对工作人员进行充分的培训和教育;4)确保对复制粘贴实践进行定期监测、衡量和评估。