Reeder Rebecca, Veach Patricia McCarthy, MacFarlane Ian M, LeRoy Bonnie S
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, OhioHealth, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):934-947. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-0063-6. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
Countertransference (CT) refers to conscious and unconscious emotions, fantasies, behaviors, perceptions, and psychological defenses genetic counselors experience in response to any aspect of genetic counseling situations (Weil 2010). Some authors theorize about the importance of recognizing and managing CT, but no studies solely aim to explore genetic counselors' experiences of the phenomenon. This study examined the extent to which clinical genetic counselors' perceive themselves as inclined to experience CT, gathered examples of CT encountered in clinical situations, and assessed their CT management strategies. An anonymous online survey, sent to NSGC members, yielded 127 usable responses. Participants completed Likert-type items rating their CT propensities; 57 of these individuals also provided examples of CT they experienced in their practice. Factor analysis of CT propensities tentatively suggested four factors: Control, Conflict Avoidance, Directiveness, and Self-Regulation, accounting for 38.5% of response variance. Thematic analysis of CT examples yielded five common triggers: general similarity to patient, medical/genetic similarity, angry patients, patient behaves differently from counselor expectations, and disclosing bad news; six common manifestations: being self-focused, projecting feelings onto the patient, intense emotional reaction to patient, being overly invested, disengagement, and physical reaction; five CT effects: disruption in rapport building, repaired empathy, over-identification, conversation does not reach fullest potential, and counselor is drained emotionally; and three management strategies: recognizing CT as it occurs, self-reflection, and consultation. Results suggest CT is a common experience, occurring in both "routine" and emotionally complex cases. Training programs, continuing education, and peer supervision might include discussion of CT, informed by examples from the present study, to increase genetic counselor awareness and skills for managing the phenomenon.
反移情(CT)是指遗传咨询师在面对遗传咨询情境的任何方面时所体验到的有意识和无意识的情绪、幻想、行为、感知及心理防御(韦尔,2010年)。一些作者对识别和管理反移情的重要性进行了理论探讨,但尚无研究专门旨在探究遗传咨询师对这一现象的体验。本研究考察了临床遗传咨询师认为自己倾向于体验反移情的程度,收集了临床情境中遇到的反移情实例,并评估了他们管理反移情的策略。向美国国家遗传咨询师协会(NSGC)成员发送的一项匿名在线调查获得了127份可用回复。参与者完成了李克特式量表项目,对他们的反移情倾向进行评分;其中57人还提供了他们在实践中经历的反移情实例。对反移情倾向的因素分析初步表明有四个因素:控制、冲突回避、指导性和自我调节,占回复方差的38.5%。对反移情实例的主题分析产生了五个常见触发因素:与患者的一般相似性、医学/遗传相似性、愤怒的患者、患者行为与咨询师预期不同以及披露坏消息;六个常见表现:自我关注、将情感投射到患者身上、对患者的强烈情绪反应、过度投入、脱离接触和身体反应;五个反移情影响:融洽关系建立受阻、共情修复、过度认同、对话未充分发挥潜力以及咨询师情感耗尽;以及三种管理策略:反移情出现时予以识别、自我反思和咨询。结果表明反移情是一种常见体验,在“常规”和情感复杂的案例中都会发生。培训项目、继续教育和同行监督可能包括根据本研究的实例对反移情进行讨论,以提高遗传咨询师对这一现象的认识和管理技能。