Suppr超能文献

在实际环境中维持筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)项目:模拟其收入与成本

Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs.

作者信息

Cowell Alexander J, Dowd William N, Mills Michael J, Hinde Jesse M, Bray Jeremy W

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2017 Feb;112 Suppl 2:101-109. doi: 10.1111/add.13650.

Abstract

AIMS

To examine the conditions under which Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) programs can be sustained by health insurance payments.

DESIGN

A mathematical model was used to estimate the number of patients needed for revenues to exceed costs.

SETTING

Three medical settings in the United States were examined: in-patient, out-patient and emergency department. Components of SBIRT were delivered by combinations of health-care practitioners (generalists) and behavioral health specialists.

PARTICIPANTS

Practitioners in seven SBIRT programs who received grants from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

MEASUREMENTS

Program costs and revenues were measured using data from grantees. Patient flows were measured from administrative data and adjusted with prevalence and screening estimates from the literature.

FINDINGS

SBIRT can be sustained through health insurance reimbursement in out-patient and emergency department settings in most staffing mixes. To sustain SBIRT in in-patient programs, a patient flow larger than the national average may be needed; if that flow is achieved, the range of screens required to maintain a surplus is narrow. Sensitivity analyses suggest that the results are very sensitive to changes in the proportion of insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in the United States can be sustained by health insurance payments under a variety of staffing models. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs can be sustained only in an in-patient setting with above-average patient flow (more than 2500 screens). Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs in out-patient and emergency department settings can be sustained with below-average patient flows (fewer than 125 000 out-patient visits and fewer than 27 000 emergency department visits).

摘要

目的

探讨通过健康保险支付来维持筛查、简短干预及转介治疗(SBIRT)项目的条件。

设计

采用数学模型来估计实现收支平衡所需的患者数量。

地点

对美国的三种医疗环境进行了研究:住院部、门诊部和急诊科。SBIRT的各个组成部分由医疗保健从业者(全科医生)和行为健康专家联合提供。

参与者

来自七个SBIRT项目且获得美国药物滥用和心理健康服务管理局(SAMHSA)资助的从业者。

测量

使用受资助者的数据来衡量项目成本和收入。通过行政数据测量患者流量,并根据文献中的患病率和筛查估计值进行调整。

结果

在大多数人员配置组合中,SBIRT可通过门诊和急诊科的健康保险报销得以维持。要在住院项目中维持SBIRT,可能需要比全国平均水平更高的患者流量;如果达到该流量,维持盈余所需的筛查范围较窄。敏感性分析表明,结果对参保患者比例的变化非常敏感。

结论

在美国,各种人员配置模式下的筛查、简短干预及转介治疗项目均可通过健康保险支付得以维持。筛查、简短干预及转介治疗项目仅在患者流量高于平均水平(超过2500次筛查)的住院环境中才能维持。门诊和急诊科环境中的筛查、简短干预及转介治疗项目在患者流量低于平均水平(门诊就诊少于125000次且急诊科就诊少于27000次)时即可维持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验