Pan Yi, Luo Zhihong, Chang Yih-Chung, Lau Kai-Chung, Ng C Y
Department of Biology and Chemistry, City University of Hong Kong , Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Department of Chemistry, University of California , Davis, California 95616, United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2017 Jan 26;121(3):669-679. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09491. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
The ionization energies (IEs) of TiO and TiO and the 0 K bond dissociation energies (D) and the heats of formation at 0 K (ΔH°) and 298 K (ΔH°) for TiO/TiO and TiO/TiO are predicted by the wave-function-based CCSDTQ/CBS approach. The CCSDTQ/CBS calculations involve the approximation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit at the coupled cluster level up to full quadruple excitations along with the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE), high-order correlation (HOC), core-valence (CV) electronic, spin-orbit (SO) coupling, and scalar relativistic (SR) effect corrections. The present calculations yield IE(TiO) = 6.815 eV and are in good agreement with the experimental IE value of 6.819 80 ± 0.000 10 eV determined in a two-color laser-pulsed field ionization-photoelectron (PFI-PE) study. The CCSDT and MRCI+Q methods give the best predictions to the harmonic frequencies: ω (ω) = 1013 (1069) and 1027 (1059) cm and the bond lengths r (r) = 1.625 (1.587) and 1.621 (1.588) Å, for TiO (TiO) compared with the experimental values. Two nearly degenerate, stable structures are found for TiO cation: TiO(C) structure has two equivalent TiO bonds, while the TiO(C) structure features a long and a short TiO bond. The IEs for the TiO(C)←TiO and TiO(C)←TiO ionization transitions are calculated to be 9.515 and 9.525 eV, respectively, giving the theoretical adiabatic IE value in good agreement with the experiment IE(TiO) = 9.573 55 ± 0.000 15 eV obtained in the previous vacuum ultraviolet (VUV)-PFI-PE study of TiO. The potential energy surface of TiO along the normal vibrational coordinates of asymmetric stretching mode (ω) is nearly flat and exhibits a double-well potential with the well of TiO (C) situated around the central well of TiO(C). This makes the theoretical calculation of ω infeasible. For the symmetric stretching (ω), the current theoretical predictions overestimate the experimental value of 829.1 ± 2.0 cm by more than 100 cm. This work together with the previous experimental and theoretical investigations supports the conclusion that the CCSDTQ/CBS approach is capable of providing reliable IE and D predictions for TiO/TiO and TiO/TiO with error limits less than or equal to 60 meV. The CCSDTQ/CBS calculations give the predictions of D(Ti-O) - D(Ti-O) = 0.004 eV and D(O-TiO) - D(O-TiO) = 2.699 eV, which are also consistent with the respective experimental determination of 0.008 32 ± 0.000 10 and 2.753 75 ± 0.000 18 eV.
采用基于波函数的CCSDTQ/CBS方法预测了TiO和TiO的电离能(IEs)、0 K键解离能(D)以及TiO/TiO和TiO/TiO在0 K(ΔH°)和298 K(ΔH°)时的生成热。CCSDTQ/CBS计算涉及到在耦合簇水平上对完整基组(CBS)极限的近似,直至完全四重激发,同时还包括零点振动能(ZPVE)、高阶相关(HOC)、芯价(CV)电子、自旋轨道(SO)耦合和标量相对论(SR)效应校正。目前的计算得出IE(TiO) = 6.815 eV,与双色激光脉冲场电离光电子(PFI - PE)研究中确定的6.819 80 ± 0.000 10 eV的实验IE值吻合良好。CCSDT和MRCI + Q方法对TiO(TiO)的谐波频率给出了最佳预测:ω(ω) = 1013(1069)和1027(1059)cm,键长r(r) = 1.625(1.587)和1.621(1.588)Å,与实验值相比。发现TiO阳离子有两个近乎简并的稳定结构:TiO(C)结构有两个等效的TiO键,而TiO(C)结构有一个长的和一个短的TiO键。计算得出TiO(C)←TiO和TiO(C)←TiO电离跃迁的IE分别为9.