Precipitating antibodies and positive skin tests in workers exposed to airborne antigens from a contaminated humidification system.

Precipitating antibodies and positive skin tests to antigens from a contaminated humidification system in a synthetic carpet yarn plant were tested in a group of exposed (n = 66) and non-exposed (n = 45) workers. The first investigation was carried out in 1979 shortly before hygienic actions to reduce exposure had been taken. In 1981 and 1985 they were repeated. The significant difference between the positive skin reactions and of positive serology (4 or more lines), observed in 1979 between the exposed and non-exposed population, was not found in 1981 and 1985. In 1979 the differences were the most pronounced in the non-smoking individuals. However, even in that category the significant difference disappeared in 1981 and 1985. A positive skin test in 1979 did not increase the chance of having a positive skin test during repeat investigations. In serology this was only the case when the positive criterion was lowered to three or more lines. This study demonstrates that, in the absence of a quantitative analysis of airborne antigens, skin tests and serology may be helpful in obtaining an estimation of antigenic contamination of the air and subsequent sensitization on a group level. However, these tests are less appropriate when used in an individual health surveillance program at this type of nonspecific antigen exposure.