Yang Man, He Min, Zhao Miao, Zou Bing, Liu Jun, Luo Ling-Min, Li Qiu-Lan, He Jun-Hui, Lei Ping-Guang
a Department of Gastroenterology , Songgang People's Hospital , Shenzhen , Guangdong , China.
b Department of Gastroenterology , Peking University Shenzhen Hospital , Shenzhen , Guangdong , China.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jun;33(6):973-980. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1281110. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended for preventing gastrointestinal lesions induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We performed this study: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of PPIs, (2) to explore the association between effectiveness and potential influential factors, and (3) to investigate the comparative effect of different PPIs.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing different classes of PPIs, or comparing PPIs with placebo, H receptor antagonists or misoprostol in NSAIDs users. Both pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed.
Analyses were based on 12,532 participants from 31 trials. PPIs were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing ulcer complications (relative risk [RR] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.42) and endoscopic peptic ulcers (RR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.33), with no subgroup differences according to class of NSAIDs, ulcer risk, history of previous ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, or age. To prevent one ulcer complication, 10 high risk patients and 268 moderate risk patients need PPI therapy. Network meta-analysis indicated that the effectiveness of different PPIs in reducing ulcer complications and endoscopic peptic ulcers is generally similar. PPIs significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse events and the related withdrawals compared to placebo; there is no difference in safety between different PPIs.
PPIs are effective and safe in preventing peptic ulcers and complications in a wide spectrum of patients requiring NSAID therapy. There is no major difference in the comparative effectiveness and safety between different PPIs.
推荐使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)预防非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)所致的胃肠道损伤。我们开展了本研究:(1)评估PPI的有效性和安全性;(2)探究有效性与潜在影响因素之间的关联;(3)研究不同PPI的比较效果。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,以识别比较不同类别PPI,或比较PPI与安慰剂、H受体拮抗剂或米索前列醇在使用NSAID患者中的随机对照试验。进行了成对荟萃分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
分析基于来自31项试验的12532名参与者。在降低溃疡并发症(相对风险[RR]=0.29;95%置信区间[CI],0.20至0.42)和内镜下消化性溃疡(RR=0.27;95%CI,0.22至0.33)方面,PPI显著优于安慰剂,根据NSAID类别、溃疡风险、既往溃疡病史、幽门螺杆菌感染或年龄无亚组差异。为预防一例溃疡并发症,10名高危患者和268名中危患者需要接受PPI治疗。网络荟萃分析表明,不同PPI在降低溃疡并发症和内镜下消化性溃疡方面的有效性总体相似。与安慰剂相比,PPI显著降低了胃肠道不良事件及相关停药率;不同PPI之间在安全性上无差异。
PPI在预防需要NSAID治疗的广泛患者群体的消化性溃疡及并发症方面有效且安全。不同PPI在比较有效性和安全性方面无重大差异。