Zwaan Jakob, Vanden Bogaerde Leonardo, Sahlin Herman, Sennerby Lars
Private Practice, Via S. Rocco 377, 24033 Calusco d'Adda, Italy.
Private Practice, Via Dante Alighieri 32, 20049 Concorezzo, Italy.
Open Dent J. 2016 Dec 9;10:680-691. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010680. eCollection 2016.
To study the clinical/radiographic outcomes and stability of a tapered implant design with a hydrophilic surface when placed in the maxilla using various protocols and followed for one year.
Ninety-seven consecutive patients treated as part of daily routine in two clinics with 163 tapered implants in healed sites, in extraction sockets and together with bone augmentation procedures in the maxilla were evaluated after one year in function. Individual healing periods varying from 0 to 6 months had been used. Insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were made at baseline. Follow-up RFA registrations were made after 6 and 12 months of loading. The marginal bone levels were measured in intraoral radiographs from baseline and after 12 months. A reference group consisting of 163 consecutive straight maxillary implants was used for the comparison of baseline IT and RFA measurements.
Five implants failed before loading, giving an implant survival rate of 96.9% and a prosthesis survival rate of 99.4% after one year. The mean marginal bone loss after one year was 0.5 mm (SD 0.4). The mean IT was statistically significantly higher for tapered than for straight reference implants (41.3 ± 12.0 Ncm 33.6 ± 12.5 Ncm, < 0.001). The tapered implants showed a statistically insignificantly higher mean ISQ value than the straight references implants (73.7 ± 6.4 ISQ 72.2 ± 8.0 ISQ, =0.119). There was no correlation between IT and marginal bone loss. There was a correlation between IT and RFA measurements ( < 0.001).
The tapered implant showed a high survival rate and minimal marginal bone loss after one year in function when using various protocols for placement. The tapered implant showed significantly higher insertion torque values than straight reference implants.
研究采用不同方案将具有亲水性表面的锥形种植体植入上颌骨并随访一年后的临床/影像学结果及稳定性。
在两家诊所作为日常诊疗一部分接受治疗的97例连续患者,共植入163枚锥形种植体,种植部位包括愈合位点、拔牙窝以及上颌骨骨增量手术部位,在功能使用一年后进行评估。个体愈合期从0至6个月不等。在基线时进行植入扭矩(IT)和共振频率分析(RFA)测量。在加载6个月和12个月后进行随访RFA记录。在基线和12个月后通过口腔内X光片测量边缘骨水平。使用由163枚连续的上颌直形种植体组成的参照组来比较基线IT和RFA测量值。
5枚种植体在加载前失败,一年后种植体存活率为96.9%,修复体存活率为99.4%。一年后的平均边缘骨吸收为0.5毫米(标准差0.4)。锥形种植体的平均IT在统计学上显著高于直形参照种植体(41.3±12.0牛顿厘米对33.6±12.5牛顿厘米,P<0.001)。锥形种植体的平均ISQ值在统计学上比直形参照种植体略高(73.7±6.4 ISQ对72.2±8.0 ISQ, P =0.119)。IT与边缘骨吸收之间无相关性。IT与RFA测量值之间存在相关性(P<0.001)。
当采用不同的植入方案时,锥形种植体在功能使用一年后显示出高存活率和最小的边缘骨吸收。锥形种植体的植入扭矩值显著高于直形参照种植体。