• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Usefulness and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Korea.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的有效性和可行性:韩国一项全国多中心回顾性研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):924-930. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.06.08.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms: an audit of its safety and efficacy in a single tertiary centre in Singapore.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤:在新加坡一家三级医疗中心的安全性和疗效评估。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Oct;60(10):526-531. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019022. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.1000例早期胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果:韩国ESD研究组多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
4
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia at anastomotic sites: a retrospective study.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠吻合口肿瘤的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5495-5500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07346-0. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development.内镜黏膜下剥离术在欧洲的应用。一种技术发展的多机构报告。
Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):664-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256413. Epub 2011 May 27.
7
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center.直肠乙状结肠巨大无蒂病变内镜黏膜下剥离术:欧洲中心的学习曲线。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jul;44(7):660-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309403. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection: a new technique for en bloc resection of a large superficial tumor in the colon and rectum.内镜下黏膜下剥离术的可行性:一种用于整块切除结肠和直肠大型浅表肿瘤的新技术。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:948293. doi: 10.1155/2011/948293. Epub 2011 May 2.
9
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors more than 50 mm in diameter.直径大于50毫米的浅表性结直肠肿瘤内镜下黏膜剥离术的疗效及安全性
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.037. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal resection: a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in the porcine rectum and distal colon.黏膜下内镜下切除术:猪直肠和降结肠的内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):829-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.037. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection and JNET classification for colorectal neoplasia: A North American academic center experience.内镜下黏膜下剥离术及JNET分类在结直肠肿瘤中的应用:北美学术中心的经验
DEN Open. 2023 Nov 27;4(1):e322. doi: 10.1002/deo2.322. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: A single-center experience in Southern Taiwan.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的临床疗效:台湾南部单中心经验。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275723. eCollection 2022.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colonic lesions: first 50 cases at a local institution.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结肠病变:当地机构的前 50 例病例。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Oct;60(10):508-511. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019130.
4
The utility of a novel colonoscope with retroflexion for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.一种具有反转功能的新型结肠镜用于大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的效用。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E130-E137. doi: 10.1055/a-0810-0567. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Dual Red Imaging Maintains Clear Visibility During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.双红成像在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中保持清晰可视性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):224-231. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5306-y. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结肠肿瘤的疗效和不良事件:比较内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术的研究的荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):583-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤的Meta分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8282-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8282.
3
Clinical outcomes of 200 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections.200 例结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的临床结果。
Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:105-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01267.x.
4
Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.结直肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的现状与展望。
Dig Endosc. 2012 May;24 Suppl 1:73-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01252.x.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development.内镜黏膜下剥离术在欧洲的应用。一种技术发展的多机构报告。
Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):664-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256413. Epub 2011 May 27.
6
Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗胃肠道肿瘤的Meta分析
Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):751-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
7
Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的临床疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.1000例早期胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果:韩国ESD研究组多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study.早期胃癌的内镜下黏膜下剥离术:一项大规模可行性研究。
Gut. 2009 Mar;58(3):331-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.165381. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
10
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection.结直肠内镜下黏膜下剥离术:现状与未来展望,包括其与内镜下黏膜切除术的区别
J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(9):641-51. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2223-4. Epub 2008 Sep 20.

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的有效性和可行性:韩国一项全国多中心回顾性研究

Usefulness and feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in Korea.

作者信息

Kim Ji Hye, Baek Il Hyun, Kim Kyoung Oh, Jang Hyun Joo, Baik Gwang Ho, Lee Chang Kyun, Min Kyeong Won

机构信息

Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):924-930. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.06.08.

DOI:10.21037/jgo.2016.06.08
PMID:28078115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5177587/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detection rate of precursor lesion of colorectal cancer and early colon cancer have recently been rising because of increased screening endoscopy and increased incidence of colorectal cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique has been reported to be useful in the treatment of such superficial lesions in colon. However, nationwide multicenter study for usefulness and feasibility of colorectal ESD is still limited.

METHODS

From January 2009 to February 2014, colorectal ESD data performed at nationwide university hospitals were enrolled in retrospective design. Demographic, clinical, technical data, and data of complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included with 191 lesions resected by colorectal ESD. The indications were epithelial lesions (n=120), neuroendocrine tumor (n=25), cancer (n=46). The lesion locations were right colon (n=45), transverse colon (n=17), descending colon (n=8), sigmoid colon (n=33), rectum (n=88). The median size of the lesions was 21.1 mm. En bloc resection rate of the lesion was 83.3%, with complete R0 resection in 73.3%. The median duration of ESD was 53.7 minutes. Factor related to En bloc resection was tumor location (right colon/transverse colon 72.6% other location 89.2%, P=0.004). Factors related complication were tumor location (right colon/transverse colon 12.9% Other location 10.13%, P=0.044) and tumor size (without complication 20.5±10.2 mm with complication 25.9±11.7 mm, P=0.027). The short term morbidity rate was 11.0% including 5 hemorrhages (2.6%) and 16 perforations (8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, ESD shows promise as a useful, potentially feasible procedure in colorectal superficial tumor because of high en bloc resection rate and low morbidity rate, especially in small lesions located from descending colon to rectum.

摘要

背景

由于结肠镜筛查的增加以及结直肠癌发病率的上升,结直肠癌前病变和早期结肠癌的检出率近来一直在提高。据报道,内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)技术在治疗结肠此类表浅病变方面很有用。然而,关于结直肠ESD实用性和可行性的全国多中心研究仍然有限。

方法

2009年1月至2014年2月,对全国各大学医院进行的结直肠ESD数据进行回顾性分析。对人口统计学、临床、技术数据以及并发症数据进行了审查。

结果

共有189例患者纳入研究,通过结直肠ESD切除了191个病变。适应证包括上皮性病变(n = 120)、神经内分泌肿瘤(n = 25)、癌(n = 46)。病变部位为右半结肠(n = 45)、横结肠(n = 17)、降结肠(n = 8)、乙状结肠(n = 33)、直肠(n = 88)。病变的中位大小为21.1毫米。病变的整块切除率为83.3%,R0完全切除率为73.3%。ESD的中位持续时间为53.7分钟。与整块切除相关的因素是肿瘤位置(右半结肠/横结肠72.6%,其他位置89.2%,P = 0.004)。与并发症相关的因素是肿瘤位置(右半结肠/横结肠12.9%,其他位置10.13%,P = 0.044)和肿瘤大小(无并发症20.5±10.2毫米,有并发症25.9±11.7毫米,P = 0.027)。短期发病率为11.0%,包括5例出血(2.6%)和16例穿孔(8.4%)。

结论

在本研究中,ESD作为一种治疗结直肠表浅肿瘤的有用且可能可行的方法显示出前景,因为其整块切除率高且发病率低,尤其是对于位于降结肠至直肠的小病变。