Chakrabarti Subho
Subho Chakrabarti, Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
World J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 22;6(4):399-409. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i4.399.
About half of the patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) become non-adherent during long-term treatment, a rate largely similar to other chronic illnesses and one that has remained unchanged over the years. Non-adherence in BD is a complex phenomenon determined by a multitude of influences. However, there is considerable uncertainty about the key determinants of non-adherence in BD. Initial research on non-adherence in BD mostly limited itself to examining demographic, clinical and medication-related factors impacting adherence. However, because of inconsistent results and failure of these studies to address the complexities of adherence behaviour, demographic and illness-related factors were alone unable to explain or predict non-adherence in BD. This prompted a shift to a more patient-centred approach of viewing non-adherence. The central element of this approach includes an emphasis on patients' decisions regarding their own treatment based on their personal beliefs, life circumstances and their perceptions of benefits and disadvantages of treatment. Patients' decision-making processes are influenced by the nature of their relationship with clinicians and the health-care system and by people in their immediate environment. The primacy of the patient's perspective on non-adherence is in keeping with the current theoretical models and concordance-based approaches to adherence behaviour in BD. Research over the past two decades has further endorsed the critical role of patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding medications, the importance of a collaborative treatment-alliance, the influence of the family, and the significance of other patient-related factors such as knowledge, stigma, patient satisfaction and access to treatment in determining non-adherence in BD. Though simply moving from an illness-centred to a patient-centred approach is unlikely to solve the problem of non-adherence in BD, such an approach is more likely to lead to a better understanding of non-adherence and more likely to yield effective solutions to tackle this common and distressing problem afflicting patients with BD.
在被诊断为双相情感障碍(BD)的患者中,约有一半在长期治疗期间会出现不依从行为,这一比例与其他慢性疾病大致相似,且多年来一直保持不变。BD患者的不依从是一个由多种因素决定的复杂现象。然而,关于BD患者不依从的关键决定因素仍存在相当大的不确定性。最初对BD患者不依从行为的研究大多局限于考察影响依从性的人口统计学、临床和药物相关因素。然而,由于这些研究结果不一致,且未能解决依从行为的复杂性,仅人口统计学和疾病相关因素无法解释或预测BD患者的不依从行为。这促使人们转向一种更以患者为中心的方法来看待不依从行为。这种方法的核心要素包括强调患者基于个人信念、生活状况以及对治疗利弊的认知来做出关于自身治疗的决定。患者的决策过程受到他们与临床医生及医疗系统的关系性质以及周围人的影响。患者对不依从行为的观点的首要地位与当前关于BD患者依从行为的理论模型和基于一致性的方法相一致。过去二十年的研究进一步证实了患者对药物的态度和信念、协作治疗联盟的重要性、家庭的影响以及其他患者相关因素(如知识、耻辱感、患者满意度和获得治疗的机会)在决定BD患者不依从行为方面的关键作用。虽然仅仅从以疾病为中心的方法转向以患者为中心的方法不太可能解决BD患者的不依从问题,但这种方法更有可能使人们更好地理解不依从行为,并更有可能产生有效的解决方案来应对这个困扰BD患者的常见且令人苦恼的问题。