Suppr超能文献

绘制双相情感障碍 (BD) 中可改变的药物依从性决定因素与理论领域框架 (TDF) 的关系:系统评价。

Mapping modifiable determinants of medication adherence in bipolar disorder (BD) to the theoretical domains framework (TDF): a systematic review.

机构信息

Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation NHS Trust, NorwichNR6 5BE, UK.

University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, NorwichNR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2021 May;51(7):1082-1098. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001446. Epub 2021 May 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Around 40% of people with bipolar disorder (BD) are non-adherent to medication leading to relapse, hospitalisation and increased suicide risk. Limited progress in addressing non-adherence may be partly attributable to insufficient understanding of the modifiable determinants of adherence that require targeting in interventions. We synthesised the modifiable determinants of adherence in BD and map them to the theoretical domains framework (TDF).

METHOD

We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, LILACS, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed until February 2020. We included studies reporting modifiable determinants of adherence in BD. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed quality, extracted modifiable determinants and mapped them to TDF.

RESULTS

We included 57 studies involving 32 894 participants. Determinants reported by patients spanned 11 of the 14 TDF domains compared to six domains represented by clinician/researcher. The TDF domains most commonly represented (% and example) in studies were: 'Environmental context and resources' (63%, e.g. experiencing side effects), 'Beliefs about consequences' (63%, e.g. beliefs about medication effects), 'Knowledge' (40%, e.g. knowledge about disorder), 'Social influences' (33%, e.g. support from family/clinicians), 'Memory, attention and decision processes' (33%, e.g. forgetfulness), 'Emotion' (21%, e.g. fear of addiction) and 'Intentions' (21%, e.g. wanting alternative treatment). 'Intentions', 'Memory, attention and decision processes' and 'Emotion' domains were only reported by patients but not clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians may be underappreciating the full range of modifiable determinants of adherence and thus not providing adherence support reflective of patients' needs. Reporting of modifiable determinants in behavioural terms facilitates developing theory-based interventions to address non-adherence in BD.

摘要

背景

大约 40%的双相情感障碍 (BD) 患者不遵医嘱服药,导致病情复发、住院和自杀风险增加。在解决不遵医嘱问题方面进展有限,部分原因可能是对可改变的遵医行为决定因素的理解不足,这些因素需要在干预措施中加以解决。我们综合了 BD 中可改变的遵医行为决定因素,并将其映射到理论领域框架 (TDF)。

方法

我们在 2020 年 2 月前检索了 CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、LILACS、Medline、PsychINFO 和 PubMed。我们纳入了报告 BD 中可改变的遵医行为决定因素的研究。两位评审员独立筛选研究、评估质量、提取可改变的决定因素,并将其映射到 TDF。

结果

我们纳入了 57 项研究,涉及 32894 名参与者。患者报告的决定因素涵盖了 TDF 的 14 个领域中的 11 个,而临床医生/研究人员仅代表了其中的 6 个领域。在研究中最常代表(%和示例)的 TDF 领域是:“环境背景和资源”(63%,例如,出现副作用)、“信念与后果”(63%,例如,对药物效果的信念)、“知识”(40%,例如,对疾病的了解)、“社会影响”(33%,例如,来自家人/临床医生的支持)、“记忆、注意力和决策过程”(33%,例如,健忘)、“情绪”(21%,例如,害怕成瘾)和“意图”(21%,例如,希望接受替代治疗)。“意图”、“记忆、注意力和决策过程”和“情绪”领域仅由患者报告,而不是临床医生。

结论

临床医生可能对遵医行为的所有可改变决定因素认识不足,因此没有提供符合患者需求的遵医支持。以行为术语报告可改变的决定因素有助于制定基于理论的干预措施,以解决 BD 中的不遵医嘱问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2031/8188530/2877feddf37c/S0033291721001446_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验