In Reply: Sedation choices and mortality: a well-defined tandem?
作者信息
Hayashida Kenshi, Nishimura Masaji, Imanaka Yuichi
机构信息
Department of Medical Informatics and Management, University Hospital, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1, Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8556, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
出版信息
J Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2299-6. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
PMID:28078442
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
In Reply: Sedation choices and mortality: a well-defined tandem?回复：镇静选择与死亡率：一种明确的关联？
J Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2299-6. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Sedation choices and mortality: a well-defined tandem?镇静选择与死亡率：一种明确的关联？
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):918. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2224-z. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Current concepts in sedation in the adult ICU.成人重症监护病房镇静的当前概念。
S D Med. 2008 Sep;61(9):333, 335.
4
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑或丙泊酚用于机械通气时间延长患者的镇静：两项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.
5
Altering intensive care sedation paradigms to improve patient outcomes.改变重症监护镇静模式以改善患者预后。
Crit Care Clin. 2009 Jul;25(3):527-38, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.05.004.
6
Dexmedetomidine versus standard care sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care: an economic evaluation.重症监护中右美托咪定与丙泊酚或咪达唑仑标准护理镇静的经济学评价
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 19;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0787-y.
7
Pink urine syndrome in intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的粉红色尿综合征。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Apr;42(2):101179. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101179. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
8
Associations Between Different Sedatives and Ventilator-Associated Events, Length of Stay, and Mortality in Patients Who Were Mechanically Ventilated.不同镇静剂与机械通气患者呼吸机相关事件、住院时间和死亡率的关联。
Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1373-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1389. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Protocol-Directed Sedation Versus Non-Protocol-Directed Sedation to Reduce the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Patients.方案导向镇静与非方案导向镇静对缩短重症监护患者机械通气时间的影响
Crit Care Nurse. 2017 Aug;37(4):78-80. doi: 10.4037/ccn2017421.
10
Trends in sedation practices in Danish intensive care units in 2003: a national survey.2003年丹麦重症监护病房镇静实践的趋势：一项全国性调查。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):60-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2856-1. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Sedation choices and mortality: a well-defined tandem?镇静选择与死亡率：一种明确的关联？
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):918. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2224-z. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
The relationship between sedative drug utilization and outcomes in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.接受机械通气的重症患者镇静药物使用情况与预后的关系。
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):763-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2196-z. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Benzodiazepine versus nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.苯二氮䓬类与非苯二氮䓬类药物在机械通气危重症成人患者中的镇静作用比较：一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9 Suppl 1):S30-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a16898.
Zotero 插件