Gwag Hye Bin, Park Taek Kyu, Song Young Bin, Kim Eun Kyoung, Jang Woo Jin, Yang Jeong Hoon, Hahn Joo-Yong, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Choi Jin-Ho, Lee Sang Hoon, Choe Yeon Hyeon, Ahn Joonghyun, Carriere Keumhee Chough, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170115. eCollection 2017.
Recent studies have proposed intravenous (IV) morphine is associated with delayed action of antiplatelet agents in acute myocardial infarction. However, it is unknown whether morphine results in increased myocardial damage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated myocardial salvage index (MSI) to determine whether IV morphine affects myocardial injury adversely in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. 299 STEMI patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging a median of 3 days after PCI. Infarct size was measured on delayed-enhancement imaging, and area at risk was quantified on T2-weighted imaging. MSI was calculated as '[area at risk-infarct size] X 100 / area at risk'. IV morphine was administrated in 32.1% of patients. Patients treated with morphine had shorter symptom to balloon time and higher prevalence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 or 1. The morphine group showed a trend toward larger MSI and infarct size and significantly greater area at risk than the non-morphine group. After propensity score matching (90 pairs), MSI was similar between the morphine and non-morphine group (46.1% versus 43.5%, P = .11), and infarct size and area at risk showed no difference. In propensity score-matched analysis, IV morphine prior to primary PCI in STEMI patients did not cause adverse impacts on myocardial salvage.
近期研究表明,静脉注射吗啡与急性心肌梗死患者抗血小板药物作用延迟有关。然而,在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,吗啡是否会导致心肌损伤增加尚不清楚。我们研究了心肌挽救指数(MSI),以确定静脉注射吗啡是否会对接受直接PCI的STEMI患者的心肌损伤产生不利影响。299例STEMI患者在PCI术后中位3天接受了对比增强磁共振成像检查。在延迟强化成像上测量梗死面积,并在T2加权成像上对危险区域进行量化。MSI计算为“[危险区域-梗死面积]×100/危险区域”。32.1%的患者接受了静脉注射吗啡。接受吗啡治疗的患者症状至球囊扩张时间较短且心肌梗死溶栓分级0或1级的患病率较高。吗啡组与非吗啡组相比,MSI和梗死面积有增大趋势,且危险区域显著更大。倾向评分匹配(90对)后吗啡组与非吗啡组MSI相似(46.1%对43.5%,P = 0.11)梗死面积和危险区域无差异。在倾向评分匹配分析中,STEMI患者直接PCI术前静脉注射吗啡对心肌挽救无不良影响。