Watanabe Toru, Kuranami Masaru, Inoue Kenichi, Masuda Norikazu, Aogi Kenjiro, Ohno Shinji, Iwata Hiroji, Mukai Hirofumi, Uemura Yukari, Ohashi Yasuo
Department of Medical Oncology, Hamamatsu Oncology Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Yamato Municipal Hospital, Yamato, Japan.
Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):759-768. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30421. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
In postoperative patients with breast cancer, the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by a taxane is a standard regimen. In the current study, the authors examined whether AC could be safely omitted, and compared the effectiveness of paclitaxel versus docetaxel.
Female postoperative patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were eligible for enrollment in this phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 84 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized to 4 cycles of doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m and cyclophosphamide at a dose of 600 mg/m (AC) followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel at a dose of 175 mg/m (ACpT) or AC followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m (ACdT), or 8 cycles of paclitaxel (PTx) or docetaxel (DTx) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival adverse events. The authors adopted a 2 × 2 factorial design to examine the AC containing-regimens (ACpT and ACdT) versus the AC free-regimens (PTx and DTx), and the paclitaxel-containing regimens (ACpT and PTx) versus the docetaxel-containing regimens (ACdT and DTx).
Of 1060 patients, 1049 were treated and included in the intention-to-treat population. The DFS results did not demonstrate noninferiority between the AC-containing and the AC-free regimens (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.982-1.448 [P = .30]). Better outcomes were noted in patients treated with the docetaxel-containing regimens compared with the paclitaxel-containing regimens with respect to DFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.589-0.875 [P = .0008]) and overall survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.574-0.980 [P = .035]). Neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting were found to occur more often in the AC-containing arms, whereas the incidence of edema was greater in the docetaxel-containing treatment arms.
Noninferiority in DFS was not demonstrated between the AC-containing and AC-free regimens. Compared with a similar regimen of paclitaxel, docetaxel appeared to increase the DFS. Cancer 2017;123:759-68. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
在乳腺癌术后患者中,蒽环类药物与环磷酰胺(AC)联合使用后再使用紫杉烷类药物是一种标准治疗方案。在本研究中,作者探讨了是否可以安全地省略AC,并比较了紫杉醇与多西他赛的疗效。
日本84个中心的女性腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌术后患者符合参与这项3期开放标签随机对照试验的条件。患者被随机分为4个周期的阿霉素,剂量为60mg/m²,环磷酰胺剂量为600mg/m²(AC),随后是4个周期的紫杉醇,剂量为175mg/m²(ACpT),或AC后接4个周期的多西他赛,剂量为75mg/m²(ACdT),或每3周进行8个周期的紫杉醇(PTx)或多西他赛(DTx)。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点包括总生存期和不良事件。作者采用2×2析因设计来研究含AC方案(ACpT和ACdT)与不含AC方案(PTx和DTx),以及含紫杉醇方案(ACpT和PTx)与含多西他赛方案(ACdT和DTx)。
1060例患者中,1049例接受治疗并纳入意向性治疗人群。DFS结果未显示含AC方案与不含AC方案之间的非劣效性(风险比[HR],1.19;95%置信区间[95%CI],0.982 - 1.448[P = 0.30])。在DFS(HR,0.72;95%CI,0.589 - 0.875[P = 0.0008])和总生存期(HR,0.75;95%CI,0.574 - 0.980[P = 0.035])方面相比,含多西他赛方案治疗的患者与含紫杉醇方案治疗的患者相比有更好的结果。发现中性粒细胞减少、恶心和呕吐在含AC组中更常发生,而水肿的发生率在含多西他赛治疗组中更高。
含AC方案与不含AC方案在DFS方面未显示非劣效性。与类似的紫杉醇方案相比,多西他赛似乎增加了DFS。《癌症》2017年;123:759 - 68。©2016美国癌症协会。