Stanley Matthew L, Parikh Natasha, Stewart Gregory W, De Brigard Felipe
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, United States.
Department of Philosophy, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, United States.
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Feb;48:283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Episodic counterfactual thoughts-imagined alternative ways in which personal past events might have occurred-are frequently accompanied by intense emotions. Here, participants recollected positive and negative autobiographical memories and then generated better and worse episodic counterfactual events from those memories. Our results suggest that the projected emotional intensity during the simulated remembered/imagined event is significantly higher than but typically positively related to the emotional intensity while remembering/imagining the event. Furthermore, repeatedly simulating counterfactual events heightened the emotional intensity felt while simulating the counterfactual event. Finally, for both the emotional intensity accompanying the experience of remembering/imagining and the projected emotional intensity during the simulated remembered/imagined event, the emotional intensity of negative memories was greater than the emotional intensity of upward counterfactuals generated from them but lower than the emotional intensity of downward counterfactuals generated from them. These findings are discussed in relation to clinical work and functional theories of counterfactual thinking.
情景式反事实思维——对个人过去事件可能发生的其他想象方式——常常伴随着强烈的情感。在此,参与者回忆积极和消极的自传体记忆,然后从这些记忆中生成更好和更糟的情景式反事实事件。我们的结果表明,在模拟的记忆/想象事件期间预计的情感强度显著高于但通常与记忆/想象该事件时的情感强度呈正相关。此外,反复模拟反事实事件会增强模拟反事实事件时所感受到的情感强度。最后,对于伴随记忆/想象体验的情感强度以及模拟的记忆/想象事件期间预计的情感强度而言,消极记忆的情感强度大于由它们产生的上行反事实的情感强度,但低于由它们产生的下行反事实的情感强度。将结合临床工作和反事实思维的功能理论对这些发现进行讨论。