Liu Alexander, Wijesurendra Rohan S, Ariga Rina, Mahmod Masliza, Levelt Eylem, Greiser Andreas, Petrou Mario, Krasopoulos George, Forfar John C, Kharbanda Rajesh K, Channon Keith M, Neubauer Stefan, Piechnik Stefan K, Ferreira Vanessa M
Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Jan 13;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2.
Perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the "splenic switch-off" sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during stress perfusion (spleen appears dark), but can only be assessed after gadolinium first-pass, when it is too late to optimize the stress response. Reduction in splenic blood volume during adenosine stress is expected to shorten native splenic T1, which may predict splenic switch-off without the need for gadolinium.
Two-hundred and twelve subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR: 1.5 T (n = 104; 75 patients, 29 healthy controls); 3 T (n = 108; 86 patients, 22 healthy controls). Native T1 was assessed using heart-rate-independent ShMOLLI prototype sequence at rest and during adenosine stress (140 μg/kg/min, 4 min, IV) in 3 short-axis slices (basal, mid-ventricular, apical). This was compared with changes in peak splenic perfusion signal intensity (ΔSI) and the "splenic switch-off" sign on conventional stress/rest gadolinium perfusion imaging. T1 values were obtained blinded to perfusion ΔSI, both were derived using regions of interest carefully placed to avoid artefacts and partial-volume effects.
Normal resting splenic T1 values were 1102 ± 66 ms (1.5 T) and 1352 ± 114 ms (3 T), slightly higher than in patients (1083 ± 59 ms, p = 0.04; 1295 ± 105 ms, p = 0.01, respectively). T1 decreased significantly during adenosine stress (mean ΔT1 ~ -40 ms), independent of field strength, age, gender, and cardiovascular diseases. While ΔT1 correlated strongly with ΔSI (rho = 0.70, p < 0.0001); neither indices showed significant correlations with conventional hemodynamic markers (rate pressure product) during stress. By ROC analysis, a ΔT1 threshold of ≥ -30 ms during stress predicted the "splenic switch-off" sign (AUC 0.90, p < 0.0001) with sensitivity (90%), specificity (88%), accuracy (90%), PPV (98%), NPV (42%).
Adenosine stress and rest splenic T1-mapping is a novel method for assessing stress responses, independent of conventional hemodynamic parameters. It enables prediction of the visual "splenic switch-off" sign without the need for gadolinium, and correlates well to changes in splenic signal intensity during stress/rest perfusion imaging. ΔT1 holds promise to facilitate optimization of stress responses before gadolinium first-pass perfusion CMR.
在腺苷负荷不足的情况下进行灌注心血管磁共振成像(CMR)会导致假阴性结果,并影响临床管理的优化。最近提出的充足负荷的标志物“脾脏关闭”征,可检测负荷灌注期间脾脏血流衰减(脾脏呈暗色),但只能在钆剂首过之后评估,此时已来不及优化负荷反应。腺苷负荷期间脾脏血容量减少预计会缩短脾脏固有T1,这可能无需钆剂就能预测脾脏关闭。
212名受试者接受了腺苷负荷CMR检查:1.5T(n = 104;75例患者,29名健康对照);3T(n = 108;86例患者,22名健康对照)。在静息状态及腺苷负荷期间(140μg/kg/min,静脉注射4分钟),使用与心率无关的ShMOLLI原型序列在3个短轴层面(基底、心室中部、心尖)评估固有T1。将其与传统负荷/静息钆剂灌注成像上脾脏灌注信号强度峰值变化(ΔSI)及“脾脏关闭”征进行比较。T1值在不知道灌注ΔSI的情况下获得,两者均使用精心放置的感兴趣区得出,以避免伪影和部分容积效应。
静息状态下正常脾脏T1值为1102±66ms(1.5T)和1352±114ms(3T),略高于患者(分别为1083±59ms,p = 0.04;1295±105ms,p = 0.01)。腺苷负荷期间T1显著降低(平均ΔT1约为-40ms),与场强、年龄、性别及心血管疾病无关。虽然ΔT1与ΔSI密切相关(rho =
0.70,p < 0.0001);但在负荷期间,这两个指标与传统血流动力学标志物(速率压力乘积)均无显著相关性。通过ROC分析,负荷期间ΔT1阈值≥ -30ms可预测“脾脏关闭”征(AUC 0.90,p < 0.0001),敏感性为90%,特异性为88%,准确性为90%,阳性预测值为98%,阴性预测值为42%。
腺苷负荷和静息状态下的脾脏T1映射是一种评估负荷反应的新方法,独立于传统血流动力学参数。它无需钆剂就能预测视觉上的“脾脏关闭”征,且与负荷/静息灌注成像期间脾脏信号强度变化密切相关。ΔT1有望在钆剂首过灌注CMR之前促进负荷反应的优化。