Costi Kerry, Solomon Lucian B, McGee Margaret A, Rickman Mark S, Howie Donald W
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital and Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1227-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.031. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
The risk of revision following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increased in young patients who undergo THA for pathologies other than primary osteoarthritis. We report the results of primary THA performed with cemented polished stems in patients aged 40 years and younger for pathologies other than primary osteoarthritis.
We investigated 52 patients (65 hips) who underwent primary THA for secondary osteoarthritis with a cemented tapered polished stem between 1990 and 2007. Clinical and radiographic outcomes, available in 46 patients (57 hips), included the Harris Hip Scores, Societe Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopedique et de Traumatologie activity, patient satisfaction, stem survival and reoperations, and assessment of prosthesis-cement-bone radiolucencies, osteolysis, and femoral bone deficiencies.
Median patient age was 34 years (16-40) and follow-up was 14 years (mean 13, range 5-22). Stem survival to the endpoint revision for loosening was 100% and to the endpoint revision for any reason, excluding infection was 88% (95% confidence interval 78-98) at 16 years. No stem was revised for aseptic loosening. Nine stems were revised for other reasons. Radiographically, one stem was definitely loose at 16 years. The median patient Harris pain score improved from marked pain to no pain at latest follow-up. Patient activity level improved, albeit minimally, for 8 years after surgery. At latest follow-up, 98% of the patients remained satisfied with their surgery.
Primary THA with a cemented polished stem shows excellent results in young patients with pathology other than primary osteoarthritis. In addition, the stem design facilitates cement within cement exchange and therefore preservation of proximal femoral bone stock at revision surgery.
对于因原发性骨关节炎以外的病理状况接受初次全髋关节置换术(THA)的年轻患者,初次THA术后翻修的风险会增加。我们报告了在40岁及以下因原发性骨关节炎以外的病理状况接受初次THA并使用骨水泥抛光柄的患者的手术结果。
我们调查了1990年至2007年间接受初次THA治疗继发性骨关节炎并使用骨水泥锥形抛光柄的52例患者(65髋)。46例患者(57髋)的临床和影像学结果包括Harris髋关节评分、国际骨科学与创伤外科学会活动度、患者满意度、柄的生存率和再次手术情况,以及对假体 - 骨水泥 - 骨界面的透亮线、骨溶解和股骨骨缺损的评估。
患者年龄中位数为34岁(16 - 40岁),随访时间为14年(平均13年,范围5 - 22年)。到因松动进行翻修的终点时,柄的生存率为100%;到因任何原因(不包括感染)进行翻修的终点时,16年时为88%(95%置信区间78 - 98)。没有柄因无菌性松动而翻修。9个柄因其他原因进行了翻修。影像学检查显示,16年时有1个柄肯定松动。患者Harris疼痛评分中位数从明显疼痛改善为末次随访时无疼痛。术后8年患者活动水平虽有轻微改善。在末次随访时,98%的患者对手术仍满意。
对于患有原发性骨关节炎以外病理状况的年轻患者,使用骨水泥抛光柄进行初次THA显示出优异的结果。此外,柄的设计便于骨水泥内骨水泥置换,因此在翻修手术时能保留近端股骨骨量。