Agrahari Mridula, Gaurav Amit Kumar, Bhattacharya Alok, Bhattacharya Sudha
School of Environmental Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2017 Mar;212:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Non LTR retrotransposons (EhLINEs and EhSINEs) occupy 11% of the Entamoeba histolytica genome. Since promoter DNA methylation at cytosines has been correlated with transcriptional silencing of transposable elements in model organisms we checked whether this was the case in EhLINE1. We located promoter activity in a 841bp fragment at 5'-end of this element by luciferase reporter assay. From RNAseq and RT-PCR analyses we selected a transcriptionally active and silent copy to study cytosine DNA methylation of the promoter region by bisulfite sequencing. None of the cytosines were methylated in either copy. Further, we looked at methylation status of a few selected cytosines in all 5'-intact EhLINE1 copies by single nucleotide incorporation opposite cytosine in bisulfite-treated DNA, where dGTP would be incorporated if the cytosine was methylated. Again we did not find evidence of cytosine methylation, indicating that expression status of this element was not correlated with promoter DNA methylation. To test for any role of cytosine methylation in transcriptional regulation of the E. histolytica Hsp70 gene in which the promoter is fully methylated under normal growth conditions, we checked methylation status and found that the promoter remained fully methylated during heat-shock as well, although transcription was greatly enhanced by heat-shock, showing that cytosine methylation is not a repressive mark for EhHsp70. Our data present direct evidence that promoter methylation, a common mode of transposon silencing, is unlikely to be involved in transcriptional regulation of EhLINE1, and reinforce the conclusion that promoter DNA methylation may not be a major contributor to transcriptional regulation in E. histolytica.
非长末端重复逆转座子(EhLINEs和EhSINEs)占溶组织内阿米巴基因组的11%。由于在模式生物中,胞嘧啶处的启动子DNA甲基化与转座元件的转录沉默相关,我们检查了EhLINE1是否也是这种情况。我们通过荧光素酶报告基因检测在该元件5'端的一个841bp片段中定位了启动子活性。通过RNAseq和RT-PCR分析,我们选择了一个转录活跃和沉默的拷贝,通过亚硫酸氢盐测序研究启动子区域的胞嘧啶DNA甲基化。两个拷贝中的胞嘧啶均未发生甲基化。此外,我们通过在亚硫酸氢盐处理的DNA中与胞嘧啶相对掺入单核苷酸来观察所有5'完整的EhLINE1拷贝中一些选定胞嘧啶的甲基化状态,如果胞嘧啶发生甲基化,则会掺入dGTP。我们再次没有发现胞嘧啶甲基化的证据,这表明该元件的表达状态与启动子DNA甲基化无关。为了测试胞嘧啶甲基化在溶组织内阿米巴Hsp70基因转录调控中的作用(该基因的启动子在正常生长条件下完全甲基化),我们检查了甲基化状态,发现尽管热休克极大地增强了转录,但启动子在热休克期间也仍然完全甲基化,这表明胞嘧啶甲基化不是EhHsp70的抑制标记。我们的数据提供了直接证据,表明启动子甲基化作为转座子沉默的常见模式,不太可能参与EhLINE1的转录调控,并强化了启动子DNA甲基化可能不是溶组织内阿米巴转录调控主要因素的结论。