Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, South Korea.
Division of Pharmacy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Jun;23(6):387-390. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.031. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
We sought to determine the frequency at which patients with elevated voriconazole (VRC) levels but no clinically evident central nervous system (CNS) toxicity subsequently develop CNS toxicity.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of adult patients with haematolologic malignancy who had a VRC serum level >5.5 μg/mL at MD Anderson Cancer Center (January 2010 to December 2015). Patients with any documented CNS toxicity at the time the VRC level was obtained or patients whose VRC was discontinued as a response to high VRC level were excluded. Neurologic status was assessed using standard grading scales. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including potentially interacting medications, were correlated with the development of toxicity.
We identified 320 such patients (mean age, 57 ± 15 years; 202 male (63%)). Subsequent CNS toxicity was documented in only 16 patients (5%). The most common CNS toxicities were visual disturbances (9/16, 56%), depressed consciousness (5/16, 31%) and cognitive disturbance (4/16, 19%). Patients with CNS toxicity tended to be older than those without (64 ± 8 vs 57 ± 15 y, p 0.08). The use of one or more neurotoxic drugs was common in patients with subsequent CNS toxicity (14/16, 88%). Reduction of VRC dose associated with the high VRC level did not correlate with less subsequent CNS toxicity.
Development of subsequent CNS toxicity is uncommon in haematolologic malignancy patients with elevated VRC levels who had no evidence of toxicity at the time the level was obtained. Automatic reduction of VRC dose out of concern for impending CNS toxicity might not be warranted.
我们旨在确定血癌患者伏立康唑(VRC)水平升高但无明显中枢神经系统(CNS)毒性的患者随后发生 CNS 毒性的频率。
我们回顾性分析了 MD 安德森癌症中心(2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月)的血癌成年患者的 VRC 血清水平>5.5μg/mL 的病历。排除 VRC 水平检测时已有任何记录的 CNS 毒性或因 VRC 水平升高而停用 VRC 的患者。使用标准分级量表评估神经状态。将人口统计学和临床特征(包括可能相互作用的药物)与毒性发展相关联。
我们共鉴定出 320 例此类患者(平均年龄,57±15 岁;202 例男性[63%])。仅 16 例患者(5%)随后出现 CNS 毒性。最常见的 CNS 毒性为视觉障碍(9/16,56%)、意识障碍(5/16,31%)和认知障碍(4/16,19%)。有 CNS 毒性的患者比无 CNS 毒性的患者年龄更大(64±8 岁比 57±15 岁,p=0.08)。随后出现 CNS 毒性的患者更常使用一种或多种神经毒性药物(14/16,88%)。与 VRC 水平升高相关的 VRC 剂量降低与随后 CNS 毒性减轻无关。
在 VRC 水平升高且无毒性证据的血癌患者中,随后发生 CNS 毒性的情况并不常见。出于对即将发生 CNS 毒性的担忧而自动降低 VRC 剂量可能没有必要。